Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

UnkindPotato t1_j4qqota wrote

I'll be voting "NO"

Everyone forgets that back in the day, nobody agreed with the .08 de facto limit, because de facto intoxication laws arwn't based in science. Nobody wanted these laws on the books because they invite corruption and give the police a reason to arrest and persecute people who aren't actually intoxicated.

The feds had to blackmail the states with federal highway funding in order to get the .08 limit passed. It worked.

I don't vote "YES" on laws that aren't supported by evidence. We don't need a hard alcohol limit, we need a set of objective measures of performance supported by science, unlike most current FSTs (with the exception of HGN) to determine intoxication

10

rosesandpiglets t1_j4qz57r wrote

Our state supreme court already decided Cannabis intoxication laws with no basis in science are fine, I’m not super hopeful

11

TVDinner360 t1_j4rxzhx wrote

I don’t think you get to vote. The legislators do.

2