atomfullerene t1_j73rqap wrote
Reply to comment by efh1 in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
It's not entirely clear to me what benefit there would be to a research team in covertly cloning a human. You obviously can't publish on it, which is the lifeblood of academic researchers. There's no obvious practical benefit to a for profit corporation, unless you want to, like, sell cloning services to rich people...in which case you have to advertise that you can do it. And it's not super clear why most governments would be interested in it.
It's certainly not impossible (especially for groups in the early stages who want to stay quiet until they have success), and after all it's a big world full of all sorts of people who try all sorts of things. I wouldn't be shocked. But I don't in general see a big motivation for people trying to covertly clone people. And generally speaking, people need motivation to spend a lot of money.
bonkly68 t1_j79scmq wrote
Human development is so complex, with so many influences, it's quite likely that a cloned "Einstein" would not be the same person, may not necessarily be drawn to the fields or acquire the abilities that distinguish the original. But someone will have to try before we know.
efh1 t1_j740o5u wrote
One scary answer you are not thinking of that is documented to exist is religious belief.
https://medium.com/predict/a-ufo-cult-that-offers-alleged-human-cloning-services-b1a95874f83b
atomfullerene t1_j742yyz wrote
eh, I mean...random tiny cults aren't really a big source of funding for research teams. They do often pull scams though.
[deleted] t1_j743crn wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments