bonkly68
bonkly68 t1_ja26cv7 wrote
Reply to comment by oh_hai_fascists in Kaiser Permanente Sued Over Hormone Therapy by derpwild
Doing intake with the client and their family and following the entire case from beginning to the end.... I didn't use the word 'expert', which actually does apply here. She didn't say, but sounds like she saw hundreds of cases. If out of two hundred cases she could have reasonably managed (taking a conservative guess - she saw intake calls rise from 10 to 70 per month) a dozen ended badly, would be six percent. That's a large number and numbers don't fully convey suffering of each individual.
It should raise red flags that only a couple of doctors are involved in approving surgery and hormones with life altering consequences, including loss of fertility for woman, and a lifetime of health problems for many, due to the powerful systematic effects of the medicines involved.
Letting kids pull the trigger on these procedures... I don't think you read the article. You don't think anything odd about groups of girls from the same high school suddenly coming in and saying we're actually boys. In my opinion, hormones and surgery don't make them boys any more than plastic surgery made Michael Jackson look white or Mary Tyler Moore look young.
Historically, most people who wanted to be the other or both sexes, just dressed and acted and lived the part.
bonkly68 t1_j9vsrbe wrote
Reply to Kaiser Permanente Sued Over Hormone Therapy by derpwild
As a background to the entire issue of sex change procedures, I recommend this account from a queer former case manager at a US transgender center.
bonkly68 t1_j9vrx66 wrote
I wonder how pot smoking compares with other factors that can contribute to coronary artery disease? Such as drinking, tobacco, highly processed food, hydrogenated oils.
bonkly68 t1_j991tac wrote
Reply to comment by diamondpredator in Why are fevers cyclical? by Key-Marionberry-9854
I've heard that white blood cells are about twice as mobile per degree C of temperature rise.
bonkly68 t1_j79scmq wrote
Reply to comment by atomfullerene in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
Human development is so complex, with so many influences, it's quite likely that a cloned "Einstein" would not be the same person, may not necessarily be drawn to the fields or acquire the abilities that distinguish the original. But someone will have to try before we know.
bonkly68 t1_izuwv58 wrote
It's an energy-efficient way to disorient and damage prey. As dogs develop and go through varied stages and random activities, most converge on shaking as one of their repertoire of preferred trajectories. Like most humans converge on walking, each in an idiosyncratic way.
bonkly68 t1_ixlp21n wrote
That's window dressing. The higher-ups definitely vetted it.
bonkly68 t1_jb8hv93 wrote
Reply to Do harmful chemicals released from a lit cigarette cover the same area as the smell does? by erizuonas
Not all the chemicals you smell in cigarette smoke are good for you, so if the smell reaches you, so do small amounts of the not-good-for-you stuff. You didn't mention if you have multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). People with this condition may have strong reactions to even dilute odors.