Submitted by TPMJB t3_10wjphe in askscience
Something I always wondered was why anabolic steroids or HGH are never prescribed to speed up graft incorporation or wound healing. They got a lot of bad press after both were seen as giving athletes unfair advantages, but I don't think we should let that get in the way of a medicine that has its uses.
The longer it takes for a graft to heal, the greater chance a patient can re-injure it.
Edit: Found an interesting paper on the topic that AAS improve recovery time: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34982051/
But I imagine the stigma of a roided out patient prevents widespread clinical use.
DoomGoober t1_j7oh23l wrote
Using rats, there is evidence that anabolic steroids can help speed muscle injury healing: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9934411/
However anabolic steroids had little effect on healing pressure ulcers (bed sores): https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD011375.pub2/full