Shadow122791 t1_iqwl5cy wrote
The bigger issue is the lack of far away galaxies missing a feature that is required if space is expanding. Should have Magnified images further away at the distances viewed so far.... But if it does then either the galaxies viewed are far brighter than galaxies closer and far smaller not fitting the standard model.
If images are right space time isn't expanding and that whole matter can't go faster than light becomes an issue as galaxies are still measured to be moving away at Lightspeed or faster. Not looking good for the big bang either since they found far more galaxies than expected at an age of the universe where the model doesn't fit....
Everything from gravitational lensing to warp drives might need all new equations now... They don't want to say that tho or they would have by now....
Shadow122791 t1_iqwnkhr wrote
Only way to account for red shift would be if the light is smeared as it's emitted.
Or lengthen on it's own the further it travels meaning light speed isn't constant and equations have to be recalculated to find the true age of things as they appear... Easier one would be if the light is emitted and drops to light speed as it is and the object emitting the light is moving relative to some other non expanding field the light latches onto. But then there should also be such high energy on the far side of the galaxies moving away at light speed+ that it should be measurable if it's there and if our technology can even see it with how it would technically be a wave that overtakes itself cause of the objects movement. So it should blue shift and then red shift at some speed as galaxies accelerate more somehow... They still haven't even bothered to address that matter at Lightspeed without expanding space issue yet either....
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments