Shadow122791
Shadow122791 t1_ixae0sp wrote
Reply to Technology’s next big thing: This robot will be the greatest consumer product of all time by MarshallBrain
So how is it supposed to be a big thing if 90% of America gets hurt in the wallet by 10 to 20 extra at the pump as people barely have money to get by......
That business model must only include one percenters...
Shadow122791 t1_iqwnkhr wrote
Reply to comment by Shadow122791 in If objects in space are far away, does light get scattered enough that it would look “low resolution” by the time it reaches us? by hau2mk7pkmxmh3u
Only way to account for red shift would be if the light is smeared as it's emitted.
Or lengthen on it's own the further it travels meaning light speed isn't constant and equations have to be recalculated to find the true age of things as they appear... Easier one would be if the light is emitted and drops to light speed as it is and the object emitting the light is moving relative to some other non expanding field the light latches onto. But then there should also be such high energy on the far side of the galaxies moving away at light speed+ that it should be measurable if it's there and if our technology can even see it with how it would technically be a wave that overtakes itself cause of the objects movement. So it should blue shift and then red shift at some speed as galaxies accelerate more somehow... They still haven't even bothered to address that matter at Lightspeed without expanding space issue yet either....
Shadow122791 t1_iqwl5cy wrote
Reply to If objects in space are far away, does light get scattered enough that it would look “low resolution” by the time it reaches us? by hau2mk7pkmxmh3u
The bigger issue is the lack of far away galaxies missing a feature that is required if space is expanding. Should have Magnified images further away at the distances viewed so far.... But if it does then either the galaxies viewed are far brighter than galaxies closer and far smaller not fitting the standard model.
If images are right space time isn't expanding and that whole matter can't go faster than light becomes an issue as galaxies are still measured to be moving away at Lightspeed or faster. Not looking good for the big bang either since they found far more galaxies than expected at an age of the universe where the model doesn't fit....
Everything from gravitational lensing to warp drives might need all new equations now... They don't want to say that tho or they would have by now....
Shadow122791 t1_iqwjrgk wrote
Reply to comment by nixiebunny in If objects in space are far away, does light get scattered enough that it would look “low resolution” by the time it reaches us? by hau2mk7pkmxmh3u
Actually if you take a few light years at light speed without something to deflect or absorb energy from free floating hydrogen and dust your ship would be destroyed before you even reach the closest star outside our solar system. and they constantly say light from anything far away goes through alot of gases and stuff which is why they can see some of it in the first place.
Also at least 1 ok art of f hydrogen or dust poo er square meter. That's alot of stuff over several light years.
Shadow122791 t1_j8o3d6n wrote
Reply to Scientists Successfully Split Seawater To Produce Green Hydrogen by __The__Anomaly__
If green mean it puts out water vapor that is 50% of global warming like water vapor is then I guess they aren't to serious about climate..
As Earth also puts out 40% of green house gases by itself.... But that leaves us with 10% or less given new discoveries that made their natural output assumptions look pathetic....