[deleted] t1_ixh5x7j wrote on November 23, 2022 at 12:25 PM

[removed]

mfb- t1_ixhfrdd wrote on November 23, 2022 at 1:56 PM

> Does that make sense?

No.

Dark matter doesn't behave like clumps of dense metals in any way, otherwise it wouldn't be dark. For all we know it's not "far away", we are inside the dark matter halo and we expect its particles to cross Earth all the time (unless it's mainly primordial black holes).

> Go 100km up and 11-12 kilometers a second sideways, and you're in an orbit around that same point.

No, you reached escape velocity.

> The lumpy, heterogeneous density of the crust and mantle do affect the surface gravity and orbits over the Earth

Sure, but this has nothing to do with OP's question.

PlaidBastard t1_ixhxlal wrote on November 23, 2022 at 4:02 PM

Woops, you were right about that velocity, but I don't think you not understanding my analogy for Newtonian gravitation really has anything to do with OP's question, either. You're absolutely right that dark matter isn't in clumps, but to detect it at all ever, it has to be less homogeneous than, say, the cosmic microwave background. I made the analogy to show how little distant, diffuse masses affect orbits.

Aseyhe t1_ixih6fa wrote on November 23, 2022 at 6:10 PM

> to detect it at all ever, it has to be less homogeneous than, say, the cosmic microwave background

That's not accurate: a uniform distribution exerts a nontrivial gravitational effect (and indeed this is something Newton got wrong, although with careful treatment, Newtonian gravity correctly predicts it).

PlaidBastard t1_iximnuc wrote on November 23, 2022 at 6:46 PM

Pardon the barely detectable difference in gravitational acceleration out of me. What is your problem?

Are you familiar with the hydraulic analogy in E&M? And how it's not perfect for all behavior in actual electrical circuits?

My analogy isn't perfect for the effect of many randomly dispersed tiny point masses (certainly <kg, we have to agree?) on the orbits of planets (10^20-25 kg?) around stars, but I get the intense impression that you're actively refusing to see how it might be useful in someone trying to understand undergrad-level astrophysics in spite of it not being a perfect analogous model for the nature and distribution of dark matter in and around our galaxy.

Yeesh.