Submitted by BmoreCityDOT t3_zsu7n1 in baltimore
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1a4ywn wrote
If the businesses want to pay for them by all means. I'd just say if you take a stroll down Broadway anytime between now and April you're going to see nothing but empty parklets where parking spaces used to be.
DONNIENARC0 t1_j1a83po wrote
The article mentions a $10/sq foot permitting fee for "leasing the public right of way"
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1ac7cb wrote
Correct. I am all for businesses having these as long as they pay for taking the public space. This all seems on the up and up to me.
They are all empty this time of year though.
ibrahimsafah t1_j1afl6l wrote
Public space for storing private vehicles?
SilentRhetoric t1_j1am868 wrote
The rightmost lane of a street is not only used for parking cars, but sometimes for driving, or biking, or walking, or athletic events, or parades, or block parties, or enabling construction access. If the restaurant has a (semi)permanent installation blocking other uses of that part of the public road, they have privatized a public asset and should pay to lease the space. Not sure why this would be controversial.
ibrahimsafah t1_j1bdk3j wrote
Like the other folks said, let’s be honest, It’s always parking and rarely any of that other stuff you mentioned. Parking is the number one complaint about them.
SaveFailsafe t1_j1b6g60 wrote
Like 1 day out of the year its not used for parking...c'mon let's be real. It's parking. Always has been.
todareistobmore t1_j1b5bd1 wrote
"Sometimes" is doing an awful lot of work here.
[deleted] t1_j1b4bme wrote
[removed]
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1ayqbk wrote
Thank you for saying that in a politer way than I would have.
[deleted] t1_j1b3w33 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j1b45jo wrote
[removed]
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1ayxej wrote
What u/silentrhetoric said. Do you disagree?
ibrahimsafah t1_j1bdoe1 wrote
I agree with his points but the argument is disingenuous because it’s ALWAYS about parking
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1bllfv wrote
My issue with them is less the parking and more the driving. The ones outside Lee’s Pint and Shell for example extended so far into the road it made driving past an issue.
TerranceBaggz t1_j1elh63 wrote
That’s because Lee’s Pint and shell did theirs without permits and they were illegal. I know this because I was with the two women from the city who issue/approve the parklets looking at O’Donnell square. When I mentioned the one at Lees and said it was posing a problem for the busses who use that route, they said they didn’t apply for a parklet and immediately walked up to check it out. Eventually they were forced to take it down.
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1es8np wrote
That's awesome! Good on your friends.
[deleted] t1_j1bq6n6 wrote
[removed]
TerranceBaggz t1_j1ekzvj wrote
Parking spaces bring in $0/sqft and make the area less livable for the people that actually live there.
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1esecg wrote
You have to pay to park on the spaces on Broadway? And it's a commercial zone.
TerranceBaggz t1_j1g1qg0 wrote
What are you trying to argue? Your comment isn’t clear.
Scrilla_Gorilla_ t1_j1gjfv3 wrote
Sorry I was unclear.
I'm not really trying to argue, my original post was just saying the parklets don't get used this time of year. So now instead of people parking on Broadway in front of the businesses they are going to they park in the narrow neighborhood side streets. Which makes it harder for the people who live in those neighborhoods to find parking by their houses.
My second comment was pointing out that the spots on Broadway are metered, so they do bring in revenue. And that it's a commercial zone, so it's not a place people live. To circle it back around, you now have people parking in neighborhoods instead of in front of the businesses they are going to.
TerranceBaggz t1_j1ou2iw wrote
- There are city garages in Fells for people who don’t live in the neighborhood and drive everywhere
- The metered parking on the south end of Broadway that is currently being used as parklets is extremely below market rate. Probably 1/50th market rate. The proposed price per square foot for the parklets of $10/sqft is still below market rate, but it will still bring in more money than a $2/hr parking spot.
- It’s a walkable area that should have very few cars. I’d argue Thames st should be completely closed to auto traffic. Human scale the area.
LuckyNumber-Bot t1_j1ou37v wrote
All the numbers in your comment added up to 69. Congrats!
1
+ 2
+ 1
+ 50
+ 10
+ 2
+ 3
= 69
^(Click here to have me scan all your future comments.)
^(Summon me on specific comments with u/LuckyNumber-Bot.)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments