HunterRoze t1_j1bnuhn wrote
To me, it's two big things - unique characters and backgrounds AND how few tropes he uses. All too often within pages, I can tell how a book will go - not with Abercombie.
Aplakka OP t1_j1boxe1 wrote
He for sure is unpredictable, like ending the second book in the trilogy with most of the book being a waste of time (some of it was useful in the third book though).
I just don't understand what's the deal with everyone hyping the characters: What are the factors that make the characters awesome?
HunterRoze t1_j1btk1i wrote
They are unique and do not follow well-established tropes for their roles.
Aplakka OP t1_j24uzqn wrote
That's true. Maybe I'm not giving enough credit for that. Or maybe I kind of thought of the trope subversion etc. as a part of the plot or worldbuilding, but it is a significant part of the characters too.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments