Submitted by Ecofolux2427 t3_zhjnpm in boston
RealtorInMA t1_izojzgf wrote
Reply to comment by Wtf_is_this1234 in What gives, landlords?? by Ecofolux2427
So in practical terms, what is the difference? If OP says, "lease to me and I'll pay up front," but landlord can't enforce a document that says this, because that would be a requirement. they have to sign and accept a standard lease and hope op pays up. Can't pursue eviction until the tenant is late based on the written agreed upon rent schedule.
Wtf_is_this1234 t1_izoktie wrote
Sure, and that's why most landlord don't want to bother with the hassle. That said, if OP were offered a lease, signed it and then wrote a check for the full balance of the lease- there's nothing illegal about it- it's just stupid.
RealtorInMA t1_izolc3u wrote
Point being, landlord legally cannot use it as a screening criteria, which is why OP cannot use it to circumvent LL's screening criteria.
Wtf_is_this1234 t1_izolia8 wrote
Be that as it may, there may be some small time landlords who are willing to take the chance, but as OP is finding, they generally consider it odd and don't want to take it into consideration.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments