Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MonkeyPanls t1_j6flg4x wrote

Reply to comment by dranaei in 🔥 A Polar Bear following photographer Paul Souders from under the ice. by W0lfsKitten

-- The post brought to you but the new FGM-186 "Polar Bear" surface to surface missile by Raytheon.

93

mentorofminos t1_j6i01l2 wrote

I hear that other missile manufacturers only fire 55% of the missile while the Polar Bear fires 100%. That's 45% more missile PER MISSILE. Truly an Animal King!

4

Masonjaruniversity t1_j6iv8qy wrote

That maybe too much missile for me. Can get like 75% and hold onto the other 25% for later?

2

FFS_WORD_WORD_NUMBER t1_j6h91aq wrote

Like the ear buds? ^^^jk

2

eyesotope86 t1_j6hxx8r wrote

If Raytheon made earbuds, they'd cost 6.5 million dollars, be made of 45 bucks worth of materials, and the first 3 generations would sound like shit and randomly blow your left ear off.

And the government would use our taxes to buy 450 million pairs.

5

jondubb t1_j6imkq1 wrote

We (US) already have knife missiles, kind of upset it wasn't named polar bear express now.

2

Zappababuru t1_j6kqu87 wrote

>knife missiles

Had no clue about this until your comment, which prompted me to Google "knife missile." That's wild. Pretty interesting idea.

1