Submitted by alison359 t3_yxvh5t in dataisbeautiful
Bloodaxe007 t1_iwqos4x wrote
I would suggest that the premise is flawed. Websites since 2000 have become a lot easier to navigate, and information more succinct.
If i can find the information i need in 8 seconds, that says nothing about my attention span, that’s just efficiency.
Penisanthonydoubs t1_iwrjmqb wrote
Not to mention the internet speed alone
FlamyMind t1_iws78ur wrote
Also the average has more experience with the internet. The majority of internet/websites are bs, you get better at filtering what you see and skip over the crap or understand faster and go to the next.
[deleted] t1_iwvlveq wrote
[deleted]
Penisanthonydoubs t1_iwyg580 wrote
Here's the thing though. It's not.
HardCounter t1_iws3k30 wrote
Also doesn't account for the degradation of quality and ads. If there's a popup ad in the middle of my screen i close it immediately, and this is typically the case with most newspaper websites. Sometimes it's a straightup paywall and closing is the cheapest option.
alpacasarebadsingers t1_iws9zex wrote
They measured how much better we get at using webpages. Now the real question is what website were they showing the goldfishes to measure their attention span.
thunderBerrins t1_iwsoo80 wrote
Also people bailing on websites that annoy them. Pop ups etc are a plague in 2022
[deleted] t1_iwu5mvi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ix8ip0k wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments