Submitted by TrueBirch t3_zfcoks in dataisbeautiful
JulianMarcello t1_izd3jtv wrote
Reply to comment by SwarthyWalnuts in Swans: The ultimate gift from your true love [OC] by TrueBirch
I seriously doubt that the writer of the song intended for repeat gifts, even though he/ she uses the word “and”. What other word would work as well and still keep the song “intact”?
If I gave my wife a puppy on day 1 and a ring on day 2. Well, I’m not also giving her a another puppy on day 2. Why would anyone think that, regardless of how I write it down?
cockmanderkeen t1_izdan1j wrote
Sucks to be your wife with her one puppy.
JulianMarcello t1_izebu1r wrote
Lol. Ironically, we actually have two puppies, thus defeating my own debate.
cockmanderkeen t1_izec79d wrote
Better to have two puppies than to win a debate
JulianMarcello t1_izedfls wrote
We love those little floofs… so yeah, what debate?
randomusername8472 t1_izev3sv wrote
If I said,
- "On day one I give you A
- On day two I give you A and B."
Then you would have 2A and 1B.
​
Otherwise I would say
- "On Day one I give you A.
- On Day two I give you B."
Then you would have 1A and 1B.
​
>Why would anyone think that, regardless of how I write it down?
Because words have largely agreed upon meanings and if you deviate from that meaning massively people don't understand you.
If you said to someone:
"On day one, I'm giving my gf a puppy, and on day 2 I'm giving her a puppy and a ring"
Then I'm certain almost all native English speakers would understand that you have given her a puppy on day one, and then another puppy and a ring on day two.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments