Submitted by jtsg_ t3_1060936 in dataisbeautiful
Comments
CashAssHash t1_j3fywx3 wrote
What about spacex, it’s legal to drink
tzfld t1_j3g2m87 wrote
Yep, strange definition of startups which includes any of these.
AfricanNorwegian t1_j3gwkfw wrote
It seems any company can be considered a startup as long as it is privatly owned.
Here's the source OP used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unicorn_startup_companies
NLwino t1_j3hxft1 wrote
Even wikipedia's definition is inconsistent:
>startups refer to new businesses that intend to grow large beyond the solo founder
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startup_company
Could be me, but after 5 years, I don't call a company new anymore. Let alone epic games that is from 1991.
PantsB t1_j3klyis wrote
My employer is privately held continuously since the late 60s, its in tech and has valuation around ~2 billion but its not listed here either. It clearly isn't the spirit of the list but then neither is Epic Games
LoopEverything t1_j3fqjdz wrote
I’m assuming 1991 is from when they were just a developer first? Then they sold their own engine (Unreal), and most recently launched Epic Game Store to compete with Steam. Guessing that’s the “startup” part.
KptEmreU t1_j3fu7im wrote
Also the funny part they made their fortune on their battle royale game the Fortnite. They were not small or un-important before the Fortnite but it was a huge boost and great success.
LAUSart t1_j3eb076 wrote
When is a startup not a startup anymore?
Extension_Swordfish1 t1_j3gm6x5 wrote
When they stop asking for free money.
haloooloolo t1_j3gnaff wrote
So, never?
Big_TX t1_j3gyt3w wrote
When it no longer relies on investor capital to fuel its operations and is able to fund its self and its growth through its own profits.
I think the looser definition is once you finish rapid scaling up. Like some people controversially considered Tesla a startup for so long even though it was a huge organization that had been around for years and had a huge market cap, because they were still “scaling up” by building lots of factories to be able to rapidly increase production and weren’t technically profitable sense they were reinvesting all their money back into expensive factories.
I don’t think Stripe and Bytedance should be on the list as they’ve more or less finished growing and are self sustaining profitable entities
31ExtensionLuck31 t1_j3gxnbn wrote
I guess when they don't want money from investors.
NLwino t1_j3e8pw1 wrote
I see 10 companies, but no startups...
CC-5576-03 t1_j3eavkm wrote
None of these are startups...
[deleted] t1_j3g0ktl wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j3h0hza wrote
A NEW business expected to expand rapidly and is in need of investment.
Lyonrra t1_j3ghx1d wrote
A highly innovative company that isn’t a spin off a well established company, IMO.
They all fit here
Fantastic_Picture384 t1_j3gk5j9 wrote
That's every company going.. twitter is a start up.. Google.. amazon.. Facebook... etc etc
bhollis6895 t1_j3h17s0 wrote
I’m not sure I would consider the companies in the post a startup but the difference between those and the ones you list is that your list consists of publicly traded companies.
BaalHammonBePraised t1_j3ehoff wrote
reported for misinformation
linklolthe3 t1_j3dzlvz wrote
Thought that valve would be on here
throwaway2454838 t1_j3e35no wrote
Apparently they are estimated at 10 billion in 2019 which seems kinda low for a company that has a virtual monopoly on the PC platform.
My guess is that epic games gets most of their value from licensing their engine.
gpranav25 t1_j3ewtdl wrote
The reason valve has a monopoly is that they continue to give a value for money service even after being the "monopoly" of PC platform. And now they even have steam deck.
bk15dcx t1_j3e4xh8 wrote
I wouldn't consider Valve aa startup
A_Mac1998 t1_j3e6qa7 wrote
I wouldn't consider Epic a startup either but they're on the list
bk15dcx t1_j3e8itk wrote
Yeah. Don't know why op chose epic
CC-5576-03 t1_j3eap7i wrote
Neither are any of the ones listed in this post.
Kinetic_Symphony t1_j3gfn1x wrote
PC gaming sadly just doesn't really have that huge of a market cap. It's all console and, dreadfully, mobile gaming that runs the world now.
wtmrFTW t1_j3fctrk wrote
Maybe 10 privately owned companies?
Netsugake t1_j3e6vsh wrote
You know I worked with startups this summer. And asked myself when does a company stop being a startup. And we should really all find a moment when it stops being a startup
wicktus t1_j3gc2ah wrote
Databricks who created that open source Spark project a startup ? Come on, we've been using it for years.
Epic Games has been around since forever with their unreal Engine and Quake Unreal games etc.
This is a very wrong definition of startup, OP, change the title to privately held 'tech' companies if you want but that's just wrong
lohborn t1_j3h3x9j wrote
Totally agree with your points, but Epic is not involved with the Quake franchise. First one was by id, newest games published by Bethesda.
You may be thinking of Unreal I and II and Unreal tournament which were originally competitors to Quake II etc.
wicktus t1_j3hj8jq wrote
Sorry Unreal indeed, I always invert both.
JeffFerox t1_j3fgddu wrote
Yeah because a company founded in 1991 is a startup…
johnny-T1 t1_j3frdx0 wrote
I’d say 5 years should be the maximum. 20 year old startup? I don’t think so.
Inaksa t1_j3gxdf4 wrote
Epic and SpaceX are start ups? What definition was used?
wheniaminspaced t1_j3h4nul wrote
SpaceX can probably still be considered a startup its older, but rocket development is a longer timeline than say social media. I doubt that Spacex is profitable yet, it likely could be if it stopped development of new systems (starlink & starship).
That said the definition they are likely using is companies they expect to go public, but have not.
Academic_Choice_7649 t1_j3fwynt wrote
This all is just a bubble valuation search on google profitable startups very rate you will find a list. I wouls suggest build a vision and creat product over it to achieve that vision if you want long-lasting impact in world
kooky_creative t1_j3egkjg wrote
I’ve never heard of ByteDance. I’ll have to check them out.
gpranav25 t1_j3ex3nz wrote
They are the creators of TikTok, but that's just a tiny tiny fraction of what they do, huge in China.
Sea_no_evil t1_j3eo2jv wrote
Not a good look for Databricks, they should have popped by now.
MarketMan123 t1_j3f7zri wrote
At that valuation OpenAI is a steal!
Not a sure thing, but a good bet.
sonofashoe t1_j3fnr54 wrote
Where would something like Bloomberg rank?
[deleted] t1_j3g3vsp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3g4k0b wrote
I’m pretty sure you don’t call a decade old company a startup. 😂 Most of the ones in the pic are more than 10 years old, that’s at least 3650 days that they’ve been around.
[deleted] t1_j3ggbmw wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3gint3 wrote
[removed]
31ExtensionLuck31 t1_j3gxf0i wrote
Wow, I would know that OpenAI was established in 2020
[deleted] t1_j3h01et wrote
A startup is not a privately owned business. It is a new business in need of investment.
None of these are started in the last year.
[deleted] t1_j3h2lbi wrote
[removed]
Dan19_82 t1_j3h47a9 wrote
How is Canva worth so much. Its garbage.
geek66 t1_j3h8ovg wrote
“Valuation” is one of the least understood concepts in people’s economic knowledge.
[deleted] t1_j3hfgjh wrote
[removed]
cat_turd_collector1 t1_j4zfvnm wrote
Hello,
We are conducting a short survey about the life of a startup and would appreciate it if you could take a few minutes to fill it out. The survey will assist us in gaining insight into the research methods employed by startups.
The link to the survey is:
https://forms.gle/vu53XaDxB8BczRma9
Thank you for your time and input.
theXsquid t1_j3h8qfv wrote
ByteDance will lose value when tik-tok starts getting banned.
medfreak t1_j3gzmsi wrote
No way a social media company controlled by the CCP in China is worth twice as much as SpaceX.
[deleted] t1_j3g79zh wrote
[deleted]
leosadovsky t1_j3frafe wrote
Spacex is not a startup. It is not scalable. It even exits only because of government/military grants and nasa patents given to it for free.
[deleted] t1_j3hhkya wrote
[removed]
jtsg_ OP t1_j3dv11j wrote
WSJ reported recently that OpenAI - the company behind viral AI tech like ChatGPT, Dall-E etc., is looking to sell shares at a valuation of $29B
This would make OpenAI, the 10th most valuable startup in the world.
Private companies valuations can be tough to gauge if they haven’t raised recently. To make this post, I collated info from public available media reports.
Over last 12-18 months, valuation of some of these companies has been marked down from their peak, while some others are still due for a correction:
- Epic Games (creator of Fortnite) raised in April 2022
- SpaceX and OpenAI are currently in talks to price their equity, and Fanatics raised recently in Dec-22
- Shein, ByteDance (Creator of TikTok), Stripe and Databricks have already written down their peak valuations. Some recent reports show that ByteDance may be further marked down (Link)
- Canva last raised in 2021 and is due for a correction (Note: one of Canva’s investor - Blackbird, has already written down their stake in Canva by 36% (Link)
Revolut also raised in 2021 and hasn’t marked down its valuation yet. This is quite possible in 2023, specially as 2 other large Fintech startups Klarna and Checkout.com has had a huge markdown (Klarna from $45.6B to $6.7B and Checkout $40B to $11B)
While there are many impressive companies on this list, OpenAI really stands out
- Together with Revolut, it's the youngest company in the list
- It has very few employees. Less than 500 according to most sources. All others have thousands of employees
- It has very little revenue - though the company projects to hit $1B revenue by 2024 (Link)
Note that the industry mentioned in the post is indicative to give an idea of their core businesses. In some cases, e.g. Fanatics, they engage in a lot of different businesses related to Sports fans.
If you like this, you can find more charts / data stories like this in my newsletter.
Source: Publicly Available Media reports
Tools: Google Slides and Vizzlo
Few-Manufacturer8862 t1_j3e9fc7 wrote
How is a company founded in 1991 a startup?