Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Hamilfton t1_itzj6jg wrote

Copy protection is a wide industry that specializes in doing just that. There's hundreds of different ways of achieving it, so you'll have to look up specific consoles or even specific games to learn more.

In the case of your CoD dvd, the disk doesn't even contain the game, but only some information to take you to the download page and maybe an activation code.

5

k1ngsn0w t1_itzj4vm wrote

It's not about making the clone of the cd, it's about the piracy prevention built into the system itself.

For context, it used to be very common in the early days of disc consoles. Playstation 1 had some, let's say vulnerabilities. But Sony and Microsoft quickly patched it and it's been borderline impossible since. Though I'm sure someone has cracked the code if you look deep enough.........

2

drafterman t1_itzjg68 wrote

Basically they include A) hidden and/or B) bad information that your average reader/write will A) not see (and therefore not duplicate) and/or B) "fix" when writing it.

When the console attempts to play the game it will A) notice that the hidden information isn't there and/or B) see that the "bad" information has been "fixed" and then not run the game.

You'd have to have a custom/proprietary reader to correctly read those parts in order to write them correctly.

2

edman007-work t1_itzn3pl wrote

Yup, I think the bad information is what the PlayStation ones use. Basically CDROM/DVD specs include a lot or error checking (like 8n10b encoding). The intent is that scratches will remove some data, and it's usually not enough to impact anything.

Sony exploited this, they put intentional low level damage in the data. Damage that any standards compliant drive would assume is a simple scratch and correct. And in fact, the vast majority were unable of doing otherwise as they had dedicated chips for making these corrections. Sony then just searched the disk for specific, predefined errors, and they could do it because they had custom chips that reported the errors. And they were able to say if the disk wasn't damaged in the right spots then it wasn't legit.

1

Flair_Helper t1_itztedj wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Loaded questions, or ones based on a false premise, are not allowed on ELI5. A loaded question is one that posits a specific view of reality and asks for explanations that confirm it. These usually include the poster's own opinion and bias, but do not always - there is overlap between this and parts of Rule 2. Note that this specifically includes false premises.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

[deleted] t1_itzixq4 wrote

[removed]

0

explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_itztexj wrote

Please read this entire message

Your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):

  • Top level comments (i.e. comments that are direct replies to the main thread) are reserved for explanations to the OP or follow up on topic questions (Rule 3).

Anecdotes, while allowed elsewhere in the thread, may not exist at the top level.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. **If you believe it was removed erroneously, explain why using this form and we will review your submission.

1