Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Kingjoe97034 t1_iu8gp8u wrote

No, I mean that historically, there is way less need to read on a farm than in a law office. I’m thinking 1820, not 2020.

11

ZacQuicksilver t1_iubzv9h wrote

Actually, literacy is actually a lot higher in historical England than the records indicate. This is because "literacy" was measured in Latin, not English; and as such there were a significant (likely over 25% of the population) number of "illiterate" people who could read and write English at the equivalent of a modern 8th-grade level.

1