Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Chicken_Water t1_izfrzhf wrote

4 engines down to 2. The article also literally states they cheaper to make and references the reduction in engines.

−1

Enchelion t1_izftana wrote

The newer planes can fly on 50% engine capacity just as the 747 could. Having 4 isn't necessarily better redundancy if you still need two working to fly.

5

Chicken_Water t1_izg7seh wrote

I thought I recalled the 747 only needing 1 engine to fly and land in an emergency. If I am remembering wrong and you're correct that it requires two, then I'd agree with you.

2

booschlatte t1_izg5zws wrote

Yeah that’s not a reduction. The number of engines has nothing to do with redundancy or safety.

1