Comments
bstix t1_jazob18 wrote
Mr_Stillian t1_jazpxrd wrote
Man's out here sounding like Kanye autotune crooning at the end of Runaway
GreasyPeter t1_jb1sw0o wrote
A lot of sounds we consider electronic effects for music were created with analog methods before computers were ubiquitous.
[deleted] t1_jb0l66g wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb0o71l wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb1dk83 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaztiin wrote
[removed]
jumpers4goaIposts t1_jazd5a9 wrote
Bonk….twang….bonk bonk bonk
Biguitarnerd t1_jb0x501 wrote
Apparently not, someone posted a link under the same parent. It’s pretty interesting actually. Although I have questions about how the string is attached to his mouth?
MinuteMan104 t1_jb1ot9j wrote
It’s tied to a wooden or bone toggle behind his teeth.
Biguitarnerd t1_jb1sfk9 wrote
Thanks that makes sense
[deleted] t1_jazgtr9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb026ru wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb0brzl wrote
[removed]
Blueberry_Mancakes t1_jaz7aok wrote
This was my first thought.
[deleted] t1_jaz38j7 wrote
[removed]
AmarakSpider t1_jaz64bx wrote
TFW native Vietnamese only found out about this on a foreign website instead of official national news :/
frznflm t1_jazp636 wrote
Right??? What's worse is that it took foreign researchers to find out that they were instruments. Like where are all the Viet archeologists and what are they doing?
[deleted] t1_jazqeli wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jazzir0 wrote
[removed]
FixerFiddler t1_jb0m5jv wrote
Most museums have thousands or even hundreds of thousands of artifacts and only a handful of people looking after them and researching them. Unless someone get intrigued by one particular object it could sit unstudied for decades or centuries.
hanr86 t1_jb0pu79 wrote
Well that's embarrassing
[deleted] t1_jazak7m wrote
[removed]
Wazzok1 t1_jb07q1w wrote
I can't believe how slow the pace of archaeological publication is... They were excavated 25 years ago, reanalysed in 2012 and 2016, and those findings took 7–11 years to be published.
JegElskerGud t1_jb0f7bb wrote
That is quite common. Just in the last decade there was a journal pushing for more of the Dead Sea Scrolls to get published.
Wazzok1 t1_jb0grnf wrote
It's just so sad at how little a single archeologist can do in their careers, and like everyone they only get one life. Added onto that the dwindling number of jobs in the field... How is archeology going to survive if it takes a decade to get "yeah this deer antler is an instrument" published?
anish714 t1_jb1d7w1 wrote
What is the bottle neck?
explorerofbells t1_jb1nrx1 wrote
You have to go to grad school and then it pays poorly
anish714 t1_jb2563b wrote
Thanks, my question was what is the bottle neck in getting research published.
highlander_net t1_jb2r94t wrote
Its not free, cost a lot. Why? dont know, the publishers ask for a lot of money even on digital journals.
The people who make peer review dont get any money for that review.
So who know why is so expensive? greedy.
Great_Hamster t1_jb5aqgk wrote
Wait, you're saying that even decent archeology journals are pay-to-publish?
Wazzok1 t1_jben3r8 wrote
That's their business model, yes.
[deleted] t1_jb0y4tx wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb12yf0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jay0v8h wrote
[removed]
Skyhawk_Illusions t1_jaz8rib wrote
facepalms ISTG this is why museums need to have their collections audited
[deleted] t1_jayxu5z wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaypwvy wrote
[removed]
NoAdhesiveness4316 t1_jazvs65 wrote
If this is from Southern Vietnam, it is likely not a Viet relic, more like Indian or Polynesian.
VapeThisBro t1_jazx6ra wrote
Wouldn't it most likely be cham
[deleted] t1_jb01tg3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaxwxsl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaxx0ef wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jay5imn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jay85jp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaygc27 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jazigpz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jazjwfy wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb09kkj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb0ktoi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb1tcxm wrote
[removed]
20inchblades t1_jb212nw wrote
Am I supposed to be outraged? They're made out of deer antlers.
NotTRYINGtobeLame OP t1_jb227tt wrote
...who said you were supposed to be outraged...?
20inchblades t1_jb239g2 wrote
Just the wording sounded like it. Apologies.
NotTRYINGtobeLame OP t1_jb25y85 wrote
No worries. Just confused! Didn't want anyone to feel bad or angry or anything lol
[deleted] t1_jazgb25 wrote
[deleted]
either-way t1_jb08r3b wrote
What tf are you on about? A 2,000 year old thing is an old thing.
[deleted] t1_jb0i5kk wrote
[deleted]
either-way t1_jb0kl6z wrote
20 generations? Buddy you are failing at basic math.
The instrument in the OP is of historical interest relating to a particular culture. Instruments from halfway around the world have little to do with it.
[deleted] t1_jb0ud7v wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jb0op0a wrote
[deleted]
DeNir8 t1_jb10qbk wrote
You know what. Keep your rediculous kingdom.
either-way t1_jb15jri wrote
I honestly don’t understand what this comment is supposed to mean, or how it relates to anything else you said.
But I see that you’ve added a ridiculous spelling mistake to your egregious math error. And I’m supposed to believe that the guy who can’t divide or spell is some expert on the historical value of preserved artifacts?
[deleted] t1_jb16bp4 wrote
[removed]
magicman419 t1_jaz0w2l wrote
I would love to hear how they were originally played.