Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

magicman419 t1_jaz0w2l wrote

I would love to hear how they were originally played.

234

AmarakSpider t1_jaz64bx wrote

TFW native Vietnamese only found out about this on a foreign website instead of official national news :/

145

Skyhawk_Illusions t1_jaz8rib wrote

facepalms ISTG this is why museums need to have their collections audited

29

NoAdhesiveness4316 t1_jazvs65 wrote

If this is from Southern Vietnam, it is likely not a Viet relic, more like Indian or Polynesian.

3

Wazzok1 t1_jb07q1w wrote

I can't believe how slow the pace of archaeological publication is... They were excavated 25 years ago, reanalysed in 2012 and 2016, and those findings took 7–11 years to be published.

132

Wazzok1 t1_jb0grnf wrote

It's just so sad at how little a single archeologist can do in their careers, and like everyone they only get one life. Added onto that the dwindling number of jobs in the field... How is archeology going to survive if it takes a decade to get "yeah this deer antler is an instrument" published?

48

either-way t1_jb0kl6z wrote

20 generations? Buddy you are failing at basic math.

The instrument in the OP is of historical interest relating to a particular culture. Instruments from halfway around the world have little to do with it.

3

FixerFiddler t1_jb0m5jv wrote

Most museums have thousands or even hundreds of thousands of artifacts and only a handful of people looking after them and researching them. Unless someone get intrigued by one particular object it could sit unstudied for decades or centuries.

18

either-way t1_jb15jri wrote

I honestly don’t understand what this comment is supposed to mean, or how it relates to anything else you said.

But I see that you’ve added a ridiculous spelling mistake to your egregious math error. And I’m supposed to believe that the guy who can’t divide or spell is some expert on the historical value of preserved artifacts?

3

20inchblades t1_jb212nw wrote

Am I supposed to be outraged? They're made out of deer antlers.

−3

highlander_net t1_jb2r94t wrote

Its not free, cost a lot. Why? dont know, the publishers ask for a lot of money even on digital journals.

The people who make peer review dont get any money for that review.

So who know why is so expensive? greedy.

3