Submitted by cargo_run_rust t3_122q7c2 in history
sfzombie13 t1_jdsq0vh wrote
must be a stock picture. either that or they have different definitions of words like skulls and mummies. those are skulls, not mummies.
johnn48 t1_jdswkj9 wrote
I was wondering what the difference was between mummified sheep heads and skulls, cause those looked like normal sheep skulls. Then I thought perhaps my phone wasn’t able to discern enough details to make the mummification visible.
relephants t1_jdt75dm wrote
While I agree, what the hell would this be a stock picture for
OneWorldMouse t1_jdtoogv wrote
You know, putting your ducks in a row but this time sheep skulls.
[deleted] t1_jdtcjj1 wrote
[removed]
cargo_run_rust OP t1_jdt84y6 wrote
The early kingdom mummies were also buried in the sand and burial pits (without tombs).
The preservation of skulls over 2000 plus years could be hard if not mummified
[deleted] t1_jduskbf wrote
[removed]
Orion14159 t1_jdtq06c wrote
I dunno, I think the safe bet is a count to see if this is really over 200 sheep. That would be solid evidence that it's the real thing.
I'll go get started on that
[deleted] t1_jduu2ez wrote
[removed]
zer0kevin t1_jdtmgt7 wrote
Looks like the rest of their bodies are not unearthed yet.
belarged t1_jdt3bfu wrote
I was guessing AI generated.
twatfantesticles t1_jdu71rj wrote
Looks like an AI picture.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments