Submitted by IslandChillin t3_z2zxf9 in history
Pokeputin t1_ixlskfc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Coins study suggests ‘fake emperor’ was real, say scientists by IslandChillin
I don't think personal unions count because despite having same head of state the countries remain separate and act each in their own interest so effectively they don't have a single ruling power.
That's why for example The British Commonwealth isn't an empire despite the king of the UK being head of state in all those countries.
I guess it makes sense to say all peoples in an empire should be under the common title though, but I think it can be tricky to define because sometimes you have states that are under a title in name, but practically independent and vice versa.
Ferengi_Earwax t1_ixmng7a wrote
Queen Victoria was crowned empress of India. More as a title to flatter her, but its technically correct because she was the figured head monarch of distinct countries/peoples.
Pokeputin t1_ixmphcv wrote
I was talking about the current British Commonwealth, during Queen Victoria Britain was obviously an Empire.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments