HoneyInBlackCoffee t1_j1luedd wrote
Reply to comment by gryphmaster in Saint Anthony of Padua revealed in stunning facial approximation by boozy81
Have you ever seen those police reconstructions? They never once actually look like the person. I'll say it again, they can't even get it right on people we know what they looked like. The human skull has very little differences person to person. You can tell if they had some diseases and such IF you an get dna from it. But what someone looked like accurately? Not a chance
gryphmaster t1_j1lupva wrote
Here’s a quick case study of positively ID’ed bodies by family members
You seem to be just running off your opinion that its totally inaccurate, when its obviously accurate enough for family members to recognize loved ones through reconstruction
HoneyInBlackCoffee t1_j1lw02e wrote
"facial sculpturing techniques has been widely criticized by forensic scientists for its lack of scientific reproduction of the final product and for its low statistical success rates"
Think ill go by the forensic expertsmate
gryphmaster t1_j1lwfj1 wrote
Lack of reproducibility has nothing to with the fidelity that you’re talking about and the entire article goes on to defend the practice against those criticisms
Way to tell me you read until you met the first thing that reconfirmed your opinions
If you want high fidelity in forensics, you def don’t want to hear about bite mark or shoe print analysis
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments