Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

gryphmaster t1_j1lupva wrote

Reply to comment by HoneyInBlackCoffee in Saint Anthony of Padua revealed in stunning facial approximation by boozy81

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/skeletal-remains-identification-facial-reconstruction

Here’s a quick case study of positively ID’ed bodies by family members

You seem to be just running off your opinion that its totally inaccurate, when its obviously accurate enough for family members to recognize loved ones through reconstruction

7

HoneyInBlackCoffee t1_j1lw02e wrote

"facial sculpturing techniques has been widely criticized by forensic scientists for its lack of scientific reproduction of the final product and for its low statistical success rates"

Think ill go by the forensic expertsmate

−3

gryphmaster t1_j1lwfj1 wrote

Lack of reproducibility has nothing to with the fidelity that you’re talking about and the entire article goes on to defend the practice against those criticisms

Way to tell me you read until you met the first thing that reconfirmed your opinions

If you want high fidelity in forensics, you def don’t want to hear about bite mark or shoe print analysis

5