Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

DomesticApeSociety t1_j1w2tye wrote

There are worse colours to have your skull painted

366

HVAC_and_Rum t1_j1w55iu wrote

Imagine having a puce skull. It's just not a good look.

93

RebbyRose t1_j1x845x wrote

I believe the skull was already painted red before they died.

104

Anticrepuscular_Ray t1_j1y1uoy wrote

The face, yeah... and transferred to the bone. I've held skulls like this, it happens.

−2

ThRippJck t1_j1x2hb1 wrote

Are we sure it's paint?

31

bajillionth_porn t1_j1yczen wrote

Oh but when I do it my grandad writes me out of the will

24

AugustZion t1_j1x0odz wrote

This sub-Reddit should be bookmarked for everyone.

TIL..everyday.

20

Woden8 t1_j1yv3uf wrote

There is a theory about all the red okra painting that was happening by humanity across the world at similar times. Red okra is still used today by certain tribes as a natural sunscreen. Humans may have been experiencing either increased solar activity, or a decrease in earths magnetic field, which caused them to both use a sunscreen, and spend far more time in caves.

13

derekr49 t1_j1zi5os wrote

Kid Named Finger?

6

jabberwockxeno t1_j2874tu wrote

I hate the way news outlets report on Prehispanic archeology and history: They always make it out to be extra macabre pointlessly.

This is a more subtle example, but one that sticks out to me is how the BBC reported on "Aztec altar with human ashes uncovered in Mexico city", the implication being it was this gruesome shrine with human ashes and burning flesh, and it's literally just an urn with the remains of relatives kept in a household, which isn't even particularly uncommon today in the western world.

Another I can't find the link to, but it was a bunch of burials found somewhere in the Andes, where the article was titled something like "Gruesome mass child burial found", and even though the burial of people was a relatively minor part of the finds with also a ton of jewlery, art, and other things being found, the article was almost entirely focused on the mortuary remains, and in a throw away line conceded that there's no evidence of sacrifice and they seemed to die of natural causes.

It's absurd: If these sorts of finds happened in Greece, Egypt, China, etc, the entire framing and what the articles focused on would be different. They'd spend WAY more time on the tombs, artwork, and the like, and frame the remains as being honoring the dead rather then making it out like it's some perverse death cult.

Even stuff like sanitation gets thrown under the bus: An Aztec noble villa and bathhouse got uncovered a while back (and I wrote up an extended multi page writeup on Aztec hygine, medicine, and botanical science in response ), and half the sites reporting on it call it a "sweat lodge" and acting as if it's a tiny hut rather then a richly painted urban construction and acting as if it's primitive mumbo jumbo rather then a piece of hygienic infrastructure.

2

MgUSF1590 t1_j1xehvw wrote

Wow, who woulda thought people finger painted a million years a go.

−15

pseudocrat_ t1_j1xy65k wrote

A millenium is one thousand, my friend

19

CruelFish t1_j1ykd2n wrote

I wouldn't be surprised at all if one million years ago there were hobby painters.

2

virtualmang t1_j20et2w wrote

What’s the name for something a million years ago?

Edit: Nothing in that naming scheme. But the closest thing is an Epoch which describes a 1 million year period. Aeon is 1 billion.

2