jadondrew t1_j8o59v1 wrote
Yeah this is not it. The intention of these schemes is to psychologically manipulate customers into spending more than they have.
[deleted] t1_j8ogdys wrote
[removed]
Sylvurphlame t1_j8oilb5 wrote
Right?
The whole splitting a purchase over installments thing a useful tool when properly utilized. But like any tool, it shouldn’t be overly relied upon. But if you have an unexpected purchase? Sure, now I can split it across two paychecks instead of taking a lump sum from my emergency fund.
jadondrew t1_j8okt0l wrote
But that’s not why they’re implementing that and I think you know that. They don’t make any money when you take on a responsible amount of debt you can pay off. They make money from the people that take on too many payments then can’t afford to pay them on time.
Sylvurphlame t1_j8olc4h wrote
Or they get a cut of the sales price, same as a normal credit card fee? Hell if I know how they work it. Not my problem.
I’ll be blunt, if it’s available and I fail to use it responsibly, that’s my problem. If it’s available and multiple people fail to use it responsibly, then that’s their problem. If it’s multiple multiple people then it’s a matter for regulators.
jadondrew t1_j8olh7s wrote
I’m not worried about myself. I’m worried about the people that are going to be harmed when this ends up at everyone’s fingertips.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments