Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

thelostcharming t1_jcmpsqr wrote

Hi, I am sorry to hear you feel that way about NJEA, but as I mentioned in my edit, MY personal goal is not to discredit anyone but to write what can be proven. Scores in most charter schools are far better but I want to know why. The small classrooms may be the key, the distribution of funds, the quality of teachers. As I mentioned below, the general perspective is that charters are selective, hurt local schools, etc, but I want to talk about the ones JC residents have access to, not the general idea of what a charter school does.

−3

hardo_chocolate t1_jcms7cf wrote

You’re fundamentally uninformed about charter schools. Ask your NJEA buddies to run the statistics on funding and class size and compare the outcomes.

For the last several years, JC Times has consistently embraced an adversarial approach to charters by specifically parroting NJEA’s spin on charters.

Enjoy the dark side.

6

thelostcharming t1_jcmskmx wrote

I want to talk about the benefits of charter schools because their scores are higher but i want to get the perspective of someone who has children in them because they can compare the schools the best.

0

bodhipooh t1_jcnb6ip wrote

>As I mentioned below, the general perspective is that charters are selective, hurt local schools, etc

That's NOT the "general perspective"... that's simply the narrative pushed by teacher unions because they stand to lose the most if/when parents get a choice in schooling.

As for why charters tend to do better, the answer is not that "small classrooms may be the key". That sounds like another self-serving finding to allow the local BOE and NJEA to push for higher budgets. The fact is that charter schools are a self-selective sample. People who choose to seek out other, better school options for their kids are already showing a higher interest and involvement in their kid's education. It's been shown over and over that the biggest determining factor in scholastic success is parental involvement. When parents take it upon themselves to be more involved in what their kids are learning, and actively participate in helping them in their scholastic experience, the result is a kid that does better. Unfortunately, a lot of parents don't understand this, or don't care, and some are simply unable to do it. To be fair, lots of parents are struggling financially and may be working more than one job, and their ability to get involved may be heavily curtailed. Others simply lack the experience/knowledge to understand the importance of getting involved. But, certainly, a lot just don't care, or don't care enough. Regardless of the reason(s) why a parent is not involved, there are no easy answers or solutions. We live in a country in which support for families is very lacking. As such, for a lot of people the option of being involved is not really a possibility.

5

Adventurous_Tea_4547 t1_jcoygd0 wrote

As others mentioned, that is certainly not the general perspective of charter schools. It's simply the belief of those who strongly believe in public schools, which happens to include a lot of academics in education as well as teachers. Most people don't share those views.

5

JournalSquire t1_jcospsg wrote

While you’re at it, please improve JCT’s reporting on traffic safety issues. Rob Leir’s reporting has been very irresponsible on multiple occasions. You’re doing the community a disservice.

2