Submitted by oceansofmyancestors t3_yopgpy in massachusetts
Doctrina_Stabilitas t1_ivj418w wrote
Reply to comment by PM_me_PMs_plox in Why is National Grid increasing rates by 64% by oceansofmyancestors
There are no U.S. flagged natural gas carriers they’ve all been out competed
None have been built since 1980
https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-16-104
Alaska has it even worse
https://maritime.law/legal-insights/us-cabotage-laws-and-alaska-lng-trade/
PM_me_PMs_plox t1_ivlpltj wrote
How can they be out-competed if foreign ships can't do domestic routes? There must be some solution here. Subsidies maybe? Seems more important than cattle farming, but I'm probably missing the scale of the oil industry.
Doctrina_Stabilitas t1_ivlrh6j wrote
No shipyards means no ships which means no ships eligible for US-US travel under the jones act
No one wants to buy us ships because they’re expensive, uneconomical against pipelines, and wouldn’t turn a profit.
Of course pipeline expansion or alternative sources get shut down by environmentalists so that’s not really an option either and we’re just left with high cost
The solution is repeal the jones act, which would never happen because supporters would go “but national defense and the jobs of sailors that remain” which has staved it off every attempt to repeal and nuclear power, which also gets shut down by environmentalists
PM_me_PMs_plox t1_ivlv74q wrote
>No shipyards means no ships which means no ships eligible for US-US travel under the jones act
This is the part that confuses me. Does a ship have to be built in the US to be US flagged? I would expect a ship built in Korea and owned by a US company could transport gas, notwithstanding the economics of it.
I guess you're probably right about the Jones Act though.
Doctrina_Stabilitas t1_ivm77md wrote
The jones act requires ships to be US built
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments