Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

QuipLogic t1_ixmhb33 wrote

You haven’t actually seen Tenet until you’ve seen it twice. The movie itself is a temporal pincer maneuver.

5

CaptainLysdexia t1_ixqhzxu wrote

Agree, and if nothing else, the poor audio mixing pretty much demands a second viewing just to try and catch the dialogue. I do think it's brilliant though.

2

straightupslow t1_ixmidhb wrote

All I can remember about this movie is trying to explain to my wife that they can move forwards literally while traveling backwards in time and she just couldn’t comprehend what I was saying. Now - I’m not even 100% sure I was right. I would absolutely have to watch it again.

1

chadnormal t1_ixmncgn wrote

Totally gets better with every viewing! It came out when I was looking after my 2yo son. I'd put it on while he was falling asleep for naptime like once a week. Watched it a bunch. I appreciated it way more after that. Did you see the theory >!that Neil (Robert Pattinson) is the Kid (character name Maximilien - last four letters lien - backwards is neil)!<There's some good YT videos about it. I like to believe the theory.

1

QuipLogic t1_ixmom9f wrote

>!Only problem with that theory is that if your entropy is reversed then you wouldn’t age. So it wouldn’t be possible for Neil to be in the same time frame as his younger self. If there are two of you then you are both the same age because you de-aged the amount of time that you would’ve aged.!<

>!If somehow the reverse of entropy doesn’t reverse your age and you can go back and meet a younger version of yourself then Neil would’ve had to been traveling back in time for years (over a decade) for him to be back in that point in time!<

2