Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JazzMusicFestival t1_j6j20sg wrote

Reply to comment by stumpcity in New Poster for 'Creed III' by MarvelsGrantMan136

Coogler didn't want to return AT ALL. It has nothing to do with waiting for him.

And the story for Creed 2 with the Dragos pretty much was going to happen.

19

stumpcity t1_j6j3woh wrote

What does any of that have to do with me explaining Stallone's consistent descents into unentertaining solipsism as the primary creative choice?

"Dragos" wasn't an inevitability at all. It was simply the first idea Stallone had pop into his head, and so it was the only idea he ever pursued. And it shows.

−21

typesett t1_j6jddkj wrote

yah but Dragos is a Rocky foe

i think Coogler would have preferred not touching Rocky people at all. although this new story reminded me of Tommy Morrison one

10

thunder-thumbs t1_j6ktame wrote

What on earth are you talking about with solipsism? I know what it means but I don’t know what you mean.

6

stumpcity t1_j6kvqp0 wrote

If you know what it means there shouldn’t be any misunderstanding then. Dunno how else to describe it than with an easily understood word you admit you understand.

−4

GoddamnCarolBaskin t1_j6ls22c wrote

The great irony is that this was a d always has been Stallone's franchise. Creed would not exist without Rocky and it's kinda weird he was pushed out of his own franchise

3