Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

CrotchetAndVomit t1_j9nulbd wrote

Dude. Fuck you. You don't get to fuck kids and it's not a " sexual orientation" to want to be.

Why the hell are all you libertarian fuck nuggets so desperate to be seen as some sort of victim all the time?

13

Ill-Reflection-9023 t1_j9osjc5 wrote

>y the hell are all you libertarian fuck nuggets so desperate to be seen as some sort of victim all the time?

we are all victims. don't be greedy

−5

CrotchetAndVomit t1_j9osq7j wrote

When equality feels like oppression you are probably one of the privileged to begin with. You lose nothing by bringing others up to your level. That is except if you're a bigoted asshole to start with

6

kauffj OP t1_j9p2tyf wrote

I've never met a libertarian interested in having sex with children. This is exactly the type of far-authoritarian bigotry that needs to stop.

−5

ericools t1_j9s6lgs wrote

I don't know if I should bother to point it out or if it's supposed to be funnier not to, but if you don't believe that the federal government should exist... Not wanting a federal law against something doesn't mean that you want people to do that thing.

----

The inability of so many people to differentiate those things makes me feel like I'm in a world of unthinking NPCs that can't really consider anything and are simply filling in their responses the way a chat bot does, seemingly coherent most of the time, but lacking a real understanding of what they are commenting on.

Or do they all on some level get it and realize your being trolled, but just want to hate on people they disagree with so much that feigning ignorance so they have the excuse is more appealing.

edit: It occurs to me that things like this are a sort of ink blot test. You say a thing that by it'self doesn't really tell you that much, but could be taken to mean a lot of very different things then wait and see how people respond, where does their mind take it.

−3

CrotchetAndVomit t1_j9s7vyy wrote

You don't get to say you're for protecting someone while stripping away the very foundations of the structure that actually protects them.

4

ericools t1_j9u66y8 wrote

I'm not sure how a snarky comment does that. Or do you think there not being a federal government would somehow do that. As if states don't have laws covering the same thing? How often does that sort of thing even go to a federal court?

0

ThunderySleep t1_j9qmjpz wrote

No, you're thinking progressives.

Kids can't consent. That's a massive violation of the NAP.

−7

CrotchetAndVomit t1_j9qn556 wrote

The fuck are you talking about? The "progressives" aren't the ones trying to change/remove the age of consent laws . OP has referred to what is otherwise known as pedophilia as a "sexual orientation" and is a vocal libertarian. The same ones trying to change those laws

Get the fuck out of here with that shit.

8

ThunderySleep t1_j9qpm8l wrote

Kids can't consent. That's a massive violation of the NAP.

Idk much about this person. But I know progressives don't believe in the age of consent anymore.

−6

CrotchetAndVomit t1_j9qq5qi wrote

You should look him up. Even the libertarians he wants to represent seem to hate him. His Twitter is full of fucked up shit and he has literally said exactly what you're claiming of "progressives". In fact, here's a link.

https://twitter.com/jeremykauffman/status/1404992317107359747?t=HpM417rB_NRY4VMJXacXQA&s=19

Also, idk what progressives your talking to but it's definitely none of the ones I know. Everyone of them that I know work to protect kids. Not fuck them.

7