Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JeffersonsDisciple t1_j8slnmi wrote

Non-violent felons shouldn't have constitutional rights taken away.

31

HikeEveryMountain t1_j8spcfa wrote

Ok, but this revised law would require THREE VIOLENT FELONIES before firearm rights would be revoked. How about we meet in the middle and say 1 violent felony is too much?

66

largeb789 t1_j8spg44 wrote

The sponsor was basically a domestic terrorist. His bill doesn't make a distinction between violent and non violent gun and explosives runner.

37

maat922 t1_j8u9unk wrote

Standing up to government thugs on the attack is about the most American thing a person can do and the exact opposite of "domestic terrorism".

−20

underratedride t1_j8uee28 wrote

Shhhhh don’t tell them. They think they’re part of the “resistance”.

−9

rossoEJ55 t1_j8w9w0i wrote

Ah so this is where all the people from Massachusetts who are going to ruin New Hampshire are.

−5

natethegreek t1_j8spri2 wrote

so felons (after completing their sentence) should be able to vote too?

19

mafiafish t1_j8sz80h wrote

Voting makes sense - violent felons having access to weapons seems like something quite different.

27

natethegreek t1_j8t57ps wrote

we were specifically talking about non-violent felons... but I agree they are different!

−1

Salt-Breakfast3030 t1_j8vznur wrote

Felons have the right to vote in almost ALL states.

In Vermont, you can vote from Prison.

5

IBlazeMyOwnPath t1_j8xmwln wrote

they should be able to vote regardless

If we provide the government with a pathway to disenfranchise people from voting by making something criminal, suddenly, we're going to find we have a lot of criminals...

3

Action-Calm t1_j8ssrhb wrote

I'll go further all felons not on parole/probation should have full constitutional rights. There is no provision for otherwise in the constitution.

13

Solid_Information_66 t1_j8sxej8 wrote

Don't commit a felony and they won't be?

1

keegan1015 t1_j8t0i3k wrote

Not defending Gerhard, (I don’t know enough about him) but non-violent should not lose their rights permanently, think Martha Stewart, or MA OUI law 2.5yrs. Welfare benefits, anything that carries over two years, even if never enforced makes a person federally prohibited

13

smartest_kobold t1_j8sufzl wrote

Do you think Jason Gerhard should be legally allowed to buy guns?

−2

maat922 t1_j8u9y06 wrote

Absolutely. Did he serve his sentence? Then yes.

−5