Submitted by TheCloudBoy t3_11qev87 in newhampshire
plz1 t1_jc2tch8 wrote
Any update on when/if we can get higher-contrast coloring on these? I love the accuracy of the previous ones, but the pastel color scheme is hard for some.
r-a-f t1_jc3dvx6 wrote
Is this helpful? Just using the Photoshop color-replace tool, so not perfect…
plz1 t1_jc3edq9 wrote
Much easier, thank you.
blogthisisyours t1_jc3kd3k wrote
Thank you!
invenio78 t1_jc4v5s4 wrote
Thanks. Much better. Couldn't tell the 4-8 and 8-12 bands with the original.
todd_ted t1_jc547kz wrote
Yes, thanks!
Quirky_Butterfly_946 t1_jc39a8j wrote
I see this with TV weather maps. They all need to make it more clear especially when one is looking at the boundary areas.
TheCloudBoy OP t1_jc3gnms wrote
This has been a challenge, especially given I was using a more detailed color wheel and attempted to hop between shades at a decent clip to help color blind folks. My only hiccup with using WMUR's color table is I don't want to be associated in *any way* with their products, otherwise I'd be working for them. I may implement a similar shade scheme like theirs, but modify it heavily.
normal_lava t1_jc3pnf4 wrote
There are websites that will help you assess whether your color choices are accessible. Here’s one: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
exhaustedretailwench t1_jc42v6o wrote
Fly4aPhish t1_jc435ld wrote
Thank you we appreciate it. The 4-8 and the 8-12 still look identical to me.
perfectbebop t1_jc3m7xr wrote
No clue if it’d be a good idea considering the size of the map, but could you add pattern to the color bands as a secondary identifier? Is common in board/card games as an adaptive measure for increased accessibility
Tony3696 t1_jc2yil4 wrote
Looks good - I say leave it as-is
twosunsyzygy t1_jc34q92 wrote
Some people have colorblindness that makes reading the map difficult to discern.
Queasy_Turnover t1_jc3ogh5 wrote
Nah, Tony can read it and he speaks for everyone.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments