Submitted by niateratez t3_yd5vfb in newhampshire
plz1 t1_itvanei wrote
Reply to comment by lendluke in Constitutional Convention ballot question by niateratez
It's more about not giving them the opportunity at all, TBH. Sure, it's a long shot, but entirely avoided risk is better than taking "safe" risks, for this stuff, IMO.
lendluke t1_itwicca wrote
You lose me at 2/3 of the voters agreed with whatever is put forward from the hypothetical convention. This seems like a great way to get popular changes (that might be unpopular to the current state legislature) approved. 2/3's is too high a hurdle for something too terrible to pass. The logic of "let's not risk it" could be used just as well to justify disbanding the NH state government else some extremists push through a terrible law.
plz1 t1_itwirs9 wrote
Fair. One thing I can think of is marijuana legalization. Im' pretty sure we have 2/3 popular support for that, at this point.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments