Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

pahnzoh t1_ixd53v5 wrote

Reply to comment by thenagain11 in I'm European, how to move to New Hampshire? by alexkourtis

If you look at your property tax bill, you'll see the the vast majority of it is itemized to schools.

Sort of problematic if you don't have kids or don't plan to.

You're being forced to pay to school other people's kids. I get that this is the way it's worked for sometime, but I don't think this is exactly ethical. You have the kids, you should pay for their schooling. You don't have kids, you don't have to pay.

That way you're not forced to pay exorbitant property taxes if you don't have kids.

−9

Arthur-Morgans-Beard t1_ixe52he wrote

Who paid for your schooling?

1

pahnzoh t1_ixeapb6 wrote

You ask that question like a child has any say in the matter.

1

Arthur-Morgans-Beard t1_ixed08s wrote

So it was taxpayer funded? Pay it back, freeloader.

1

pahnzoh t1_ixeds3o wrote

Freeloader? I pay plenty of taxes.

Never even said I went to public school.

Why the bad attitude?

1

Arthur-Morgans-Beard t1_ixees9t wrote

Because, attending public school and benefitting from its teachings only to turn around and say you shouldn't have to fund it as an adult is the ultimate "fuck you, I got mine". I don't like the property tax rate either, but others paid for me to learn and give me the opportunity to turn myself into a functioning adult, so I should pay it back. Unless you have some other brilliant idea on how to do it, it sounds like you think we don't have to educate future generations, or more likely, just the poor kids.

1

theCatch_man t1_ixe6dtz wrote

This is bad logic. Better schools for anyone’s kids is better for all of us in the long run. Better for the economy, better for society as a whole.

We also pay for plenty of things we don’t use, like anyone under 40 for social security and everyone paying for Medicare even if we don’t use it. We should pay, because social programs are good for the entire population in the long run, and just because you don’t have kids doesn’t mean you won’t benefit from a well educated population.

1

pahnzoh t1_ixeamk7 wrote

It's not bad logic. I want good schooling too. Through voluntary market exchange like the rest of the products and services I buy. Pay for what you use, and don't pay for what you don't.

I just don't want to use violence and extortion to pay for it.

I would dissolve those socialist programs as well as they are intergenerational extortion.

0

theCatch_man t1_ixefusf wrote

Again, if I don’t use the highways should I not pay taxes for infrastructure? If I never see a penny of social security should I not pay any income tax? This logic just doesn’t make sense, we can’t just say that since we don’t use something we shouldn’t pay for it.

What about the police or fire departments? My house has never set fire and I’ve never been robbed, but we can’t just tax people who use those services!

1

pahnzoh t1_ixehf6u wrote

It is hard to come up with a perfect ethical solution when we are born into social systems that have relied on debt financing, political corruption, extortion, taxation, forced governance, and the like.

I don't see any problem with use-based payments for infrastructure. We already have them, they're call tolls. It's just a different way of funding things.

All of these services can be performed by the private market by paying for them. I understand that's not the way we've done it, but you can certainly do it without the government middle man.

It's completely logical, you just haven't heard of it because it's not taught in schools or discussed in media.

1

theCatch_man t1_ixejbvn wrote

I can definitely see where you are coming from better now. It makes sense, but I still don’t think that’s the right way to view these issues.

I think use-based systems won’t work unless there’s a clear way to tax people fairly. For consideration, think if a billionaire pays $0.50 for a toll versus someone getting paid 7.50/hour. The billionaires’ tax burden is significantly less for that toll than the min. wage worker.

I also don’t think the private market should be a way to pay for roads, infrastructure, and education. I think time and time again, when you let capitalism run rampant, it hurts the working and middle class while benefiting a fraction of the wealthiest people. If all schools were private and looking to increase profits, I don’t understand how that could benefit the common person. I think that may lead to more corruption than in the government. The free market idea needs to be very well regulated, and the government should take on costs that won’t be explicitly profitable (schools, roads, etc) but are either a necessity or provide economic value down the road.

As a side note, I have no idea what “forced governance” you mean.

1