Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bookon t1_izaksie wrote

No... They are lying and you seem to want to be lied too, but what I said was that getting multiple ballots isn't fraud. There are safeguards to keep people from submitting multiple ballots from the same person. And other safeguards keep those ballots from being counted.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_izalfk2 wrote

I get that, there are also safeguards to prevent dead people from getting unemployment. I know this is hard for you, but I am skeptical of a system that mails a ballot to an old resident of a house to begin with. I think the original article we commented on was about a guy who has voted in both MA and NH…how many years before he got caught? We have safeguards for that…no?

1

bookon t1_izanjka wrote

Let me end with this. You are GREATLY over estimating the danger we face from a few errant votes and they are using your unfounded fears as a weapon to get you to not trust results they don't want you to trust.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_izanu4i wrote

You trust the same system that sends out $45B in errant unemployment benefits.

1

bookon t1_izatz28 wrote

The elections and unemployment benefits are handled by different people. You need this conspiracy because you can't admit your preferred candidates aren't as popular as you think they are.

1