Clinically-Inane t1_j2ywpdb wrote
Reply to comment by PossiblyCreepy605 in AG: Police shot and killed teenager allegedly armed with knife in Gilford | New Hampshire Public Radio by ACOdysseybeatsRDR2
Nothing; I can’t “picture” things. I’d hear the word “child” and know it meant someone who is under 18, aka Not An Adult By Definition because words have meanings
19 and 20 year olds haven’t actually emotionally or mentally grown into adulthood though, even if they have adult lives at that point; the human brain isn’t finished developing until our mid 20s, but we still arbitrarily consider anyone over 18 an adult even though that’s not very fair
If you’re not working with a fully matured adult brain capable of adult rationale, instincts, and impulse control, you can’t reasonably be expected to actually be a fully matured adult— but that’s what we expect anyway (even though ALL of the science tells us human brains are not Adult until ~7 years after age 18)
PossiblyCreepy605 t1_j2z5e66 wrote
>Nothing; I can’t “picture” things. I’d hear the word “child” and know it meant someone who is under 18,
Oh come on now. You're clearly being disingenuous and you aren't even trying to hide it. Stop that.
If you ask anyone not trying to be obtuse for fake Internet points, they would answer probably a boy or girl under the age of 10. Preteens are between 11-13, teenagers 14-17 give or take a year. Using that basic common sense, you hear some person online screeching about police killing a child, their thought immediately goes to someone under 10. Not a 17 year old who is capable of serving in a literal combat role in the military and has the size and strength to physically harm members of our community.
You are purposely trying to mislead people by using emotionally charged language that doesn't paint an accurate picture. And you know it.
[deleted] t1_j3jld88 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments