AuthorSnow OP t1_j2zhhre wrote on January 5, 2023 at 12:42 AM

Reply to comment by kodiakbear_ in New Hampshire Bill Would Ban “No-Knock” Warrants by AuthorSnow

Correct me if I’m wrong, didn’t SCOTUS say they were constitutional? Don’t get wrong, I think this is incorrect but isn’t that the ruling nonetheless?

DemonDuo t1_j2zmdqs wrote on January 5, 2023 at 1:16 AM

SCOTUS.. More like SCROTUM

kodiakbear_ t1_j2zw4d4 wrote on January 5, 2023 at 2:23 AM

Got me good haha

FrostGamezzTV t1_j34e95a wrote on January 5, 2023 at 11:34 PM

Got em

GreatGrandaddyPurp t1_j3191ei wrote on January 5, 2023 at 10:33 AM

The SCOTUS has frequently ruled that the constitution is made of toilet paper

FrostGamezzTV t1_j34ec8i wrote on January 5, 2023 at 11:35 PM

Oh so they're the last to have a say in what the constitution means.

Alex_2259 t1_j31i2cu wrote on January 5, 2023 at 12:19 PM

Except when it benefits the people you expect it to, think Citizens divided (Citizens United ruling)

lendluke t1_j31ggyt wrote on January 5, 2023 at 12:02 PM

Also, SCOTUS is never granted the power to rule on constitutionality in the constitution (not that I think it has been a net negative to have some body rule on constitutionality, even watered down version).

NHBikerHiker t1_j30hrfw wrote on January 5, 2023 at 5:11 AM

Late 90s court case — yes, no knock warrants are constitutional. It was a unanimous decision, btw.