Submitted by AuthorSnow t3_103exna in newhampshire
kodiakbear_ t1_j2zapfk wrote
Reply to comment by ZacPetkanas in New Hampshire Bill Would Ban “No-Knock” Warrants by AuthorSnow
Not to mention unconstitutional
AuthorSnow OP t1_j2zhhre wrote
Correct me if I’m wrong, didn’t SCOTUS say they were constitutional? Don’t get wrong, I think this is incorrect but isn’t that the ruling nonetheless?
DemonDuo t1_j2zmdqs wrote
SCOTUS.. More like SCROTUM
kodiakbear_ t1_j2zw4d4 wrote
Got me good haha
FrostGamezzTV t1_j34e95a wrote
Got em
GreatGrandaddyPurp t1_j3191ei wrote
The SCOTUS has frequently ruled that the constitution is made of toilet paper
FrostGamezzTV t1_j34ec8i wrote
Oh so they're the last to have a say in what the constitution means.
Alex_2259 t1_j31i2cu wrote
Except when it benefits the people you expect it to, think Citizens divided (Citizens United ruling)
lendluke t1_j31ggyt wrote
Also, SCOTUS is never granted the power to rule on constitutionality in the constitution (not that I think it has been a net negative to have some body rule on constitutionality, even watered down version).
NHBikerHiker t1_j30hrfw wrote
Late 90s court case — yes, no knock warrants are constitutional. It was a unanimous decision, btw.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments