Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

rossiterpj OP t1_j5bfyx8 wrote

I'm all for taking some measures to cut the red light-running and the obnoxious loud cars and bikes. Bring on the traffic cameras.

14

100percent100percent t1_j5c1nik wrote

I do late night deliveries and sometimes I have to run red lights that never change. I'm sitting there for no reason at 3am with no other cars.

I'm for better enforcement of dangerous running of red lights obviously, but I don't want to get an automatic ticket because the stupid light hasn't turned green for 5 minutes at 3 in the morning.

I personally think you should be able to treat red lights as stop signs between 2am-5am or something like that. It's ridiculous how long I just sit at lights for absolutely no reason. Like it probably is close to an hour of my time that I'm out doing deliveries in a night.

16

kesagatame-and-Chill t1_j5c3dl1 wrote

Automatic traffic enforcement. Lights, speeding and sound. Driving is a privilege, not a right and so many assholes are killing and injuring people. Cops don’t do enforcement, bring on the robots.

17

100percent100percent t1_j5c4iqi wrote

I'm not saying you can blow through lights, I'm saying that when it's the middle of the night, you stop at the light, look around, make sure it's clear and continue.

I'm out super late almost every night, the roads are empty. There is no reason to sit at a red light with no other cars coming. You would still have to yield to pedestrians and its very rare I see anyone on the sidewalks at that hour anyway.

How is that any different than a stop sign? They either need to allow us to continue, or change more lights to flashing red during late night hours like some areas already do.

8

Taco_Man- t1_j5clfag wrote

They do this in Puerto Rico. I don’t know the exact times, but sometime after midnight the lights all go flashing red (essentially a stop sign) since there’s hardly anyone on the road at that time. Good idea if you ask me.

3

TreeEleben t1_j5cqsua wrote

Harley owners would be be pissed. They're the loudest things on the roads, and fucking infuriating when they ride home waking up everybody along their route after the bars close.

9

eddie964 t1_j5crjtj wrote

I'm sympathetic, but I think the solution is a review of light timing and maybe some blinking reds during the wee hours. When people start to see stopping at red lights a suggestion, it can get to be an awfully slippery slope.

4

ihgordonk t1_j5ctjt1 wrote

the double whammy: get catalytic converter stolen, get slapped with noise pollution fine

10

bigtuna732 t1_j5cxqum wrote

They have license plate covers and spray so you can block your plate… some people use these to avoid the electronic tolls or cameras

1

brewski t1_j5fekzz wrote

Nor do they have the manpower to watch every intersection. If they capture a photo of the driver, there may be a way to track the car owner. Or whatever. Some people are going to circumvent the system, but at the risk of a significantly higher penalty. They will catch a lot of reckless bastards with the cameras.

3

lazy-but-talented t1_j5kyu3r wrote

It would needlessly clog up an already struggling violation appeals process. Would overwhelmingly confuse drivers who are used to right on red which would need to be posted, fewer right on red intersections would only congest intersections more and lead to longer wait times. Won’t deter dangerous drivers who’ll keep violating anyways.

on the noise side if relying on digital location of high-noise offenders to dispatch a unit a similar system has already failed in the shotspotter gunshot detector

0