Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

isawagoose t1_j9rqr3a wrote

Reply to comment by lifevicarious in Blizzard warning is first for Southern California mountains since 1989: National Weather Service by Anthony12125

You're assuming it's an isolated event and not part of a steady trend as it actually is.

2

lifevicarious t1_j9rremo wrote

Im not. But you and the grandma are talking about weather. One month of warmer weather is not climate change. It’s warmer weather like it’s colder in CA.

1

isawagoose t1_j9rrwkk wrote

It's not "one month" of warmer weather. It's a steady pattern of increasingly warmer winters with less and less precipitation. I said February because it's February right now, not because it's a single anomalously warm month.

1

lifevicarious t1_j9rsr6r wrote

You said one February . If you meant all winter say all fucking winter. Don’t blame me for calling you out on what you said as opposed to what you now say you meant. Even if all winter that’s weather. Not global warming. Milwaukee hit a high temp of 62 in Feb in 1984. One month or one winter or one day is weather. Years and decades is climate change. So again, your stated example is just as bad as grandmas.

0

isawagoose t1_j9rtbb6 wrote

What the fuck do you not understand about the word "trend?" If you're here just to be a pedantic contrarian, shut the fuck up and bother someone else.

0

lifevicarious t1_j9ru998 wrote

Jesus fucking Christ dude. You didn’t say trend. You said all of February. Three fucking weeks is not a trend. It’s not pedantic. If you don’t want to be called out for saying something incorrect don’t say something incorrect. For the third time three fucking weeks of warmer than average is just as stupid as grandma arguing against global warming based on a blizzard where it’s usually warm.

2