lifevicarious
lifevicarious t1_j9rsr6r wrote
Reply to comment by isawagoose in Blizzard warning is first for Southern California mountains since 1989: National Weather Service by Anthony12125
You said one February . If you meant all winter say all fucking winter. Don’t blame me for calling you out on what you said as opposed to what you now say you meant. Even if all winter that’s weather. Not global warming. Milwaukee hit a high temp of 62 in Feb in 1984. One month or one winter or one day is weather. Years and decades is climate change. So again, your stated example is just as bad as grandmas.
lifevicarious t1_j9rremo wrote
Reply to comment by isawagoose in Blizzard warning is first for Southern California mountains since 1989: National Weather Service by Anthony12125
Im not. But you and the grandma are talking about weather. One month of warmer weather is not climate change. It’s warmer weather like it’s colder in CA.
lifevicarious t1_j9p8r66 wrote
Reply to comment by isawagoose in Blizzard warning is first for Southern California mountains since 1989: National Weather Service by Anthony12125
In the grandmas defense, your example is just as bad to prove global warming as hers is to disprove it. And I am a believer in climate change.
lifevicarious t1_j9ru998 wrote
Reply to comment by isawagoose in Blizzard warning is first for Southern California mountains since 1989: National Weather Service by Anthony12125
Jesus fucking Christ dude. You didn’t say trend. You said all of February. Three fucking weeks is not a trend. It’s not pedantic. If you don’t want to be called out for saying something incorrect don’t say something incorrect. For the third time three fucking weeks of warmer than average is just as stupid as grandma arguing against global warming based on a blizzard where it’s usually warm.