Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Twintower34 t1_j795fs2 wrote

How do you know they're mostly low skilled?

1

New-Work-139 t1_j796vb9 wrote

Well they’re low-wage and hourly which is usually a pretty strong indicator. They work in hospitality which has very few trade certifications or pathways for skilled positions, at least in the theme park context. I think it’s pretty obvious they’re low skilled.

0

Twintower34 t1_j797933 wrote

>Well they’re low-wage and hourly which is usually a pretty strong indicator.

Not really.

>They work in hospitality which has very few trade certifications or pathways for skilled positions, at least in the theme park context.

Not having trade certifications, doesn't make someone low skill though.

>I think it’s pretty obvious they’re low skilled.

It's not. You just have a narrow idea of what it means to be skilled.

1

New-Work-139 t1_j799xhy wrote

I appreciate the point you’re trying to make but “low skilled” is a federally defined professional circumstance and includes on-the-ground hospitality workers.

2

Twintower34 t1_j79a6lx wrote

I don't care how the BLS describes workers.

−1

New-Work-139 t1_j79b9xd wrote

At which a point you’re stuck with unfounded opinions not worthy of much consideration

4

Twintower34 t1_j79cla9 wrote

That's fine. I'd rather not waste time discussing what is/isn't a skill, with someone who uses the fed government's opinion on the subject.

Carry on

0