Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_ja7is27 wrote

−17

CrazyLlama71 t1_ja83q44 wrote

Thanks for proving my point. Driver hits cyclist and in retaliation another cyclist shoots driver. Didn’t stop the cyclist from getting hit.

4

[deleted] t1_ja857ud wrote

[removed]

−3

17times2 t1_ja86ito wrote

> Driver hits cyclist and in retaliation another cyclist shoots driver. Didn’t stop the cyclist from getting hit.

Nothing about this changed in the 2nd article.

> Downvote away

OK.

3

[deleted] t1_ja87p9i wrote

[removed]

1

17times2 t1_ja88dz6 wrote

> He stopped himself... from being hit when the driver returned.

Demonstrably false, according to the article. The driver not hitting him was why he was able to shoot in the first place.

> He stopped... others from being hit when the driver returned.

Demonstrably false, according to the article. There were no others with them.

2