SsurebreC t1_je692e2 wrote
Reply to comment by houtex727 in 11 current and former East Cleveland police officers indicted after ‘appalling’ behavior caught on video, prosecutor says by AudibleNod
> I get their jobs are tough
Let's say someone is working as a nurse or a care-giver and they beat up their patients. Not all of them but a certain amount. Say 5%. Should that person still be employed in that capacity? No. Should they be charged with abuse? Yes.
It's just that simple.
And the solution to this is also simple. Get mandatory malpractice insurance for the police like they have for those same nurses and surgeons. This insurance is what's used to pay out all the lawsuits that will be filed. A shitty police officer will have higher premiums and will ultimately be out of a job anywhere in the country rather than being protected now or moving to another department whlie keeping their job.
If police officers believe they're the military and it's them vs. civilians then they should then be required to follow the rules of engagements that actual soldiers do (and the related code of conduct) which is significantly harsher than what the police have now.
girlfreddyf t1_je6e8os wrote
Exactly. I can't understand those who back cops 100% no matter what they do.
deferens t1_je6zo77 wrote
Oh, I understand it alright. Those people who back cops 100% no matter what, got real, real quiet when a bunch of Black cops beat a guy to death.
Chance-Ad-9103 t1_je8hjsu wrote
Hierarchy is very important to a large subset of the population. It’s not what someone does, it’s who that person is that matters. These are police officers and that is enough to make there actions justified in the minds of maybe 40% of our country. Goes just the same for clergy, the wealthy, the military. This is how you can have a dyed in the wool small government conservative 100% pro police and military the two largest most active and shall we say hands on government organizations. It’s ridiculous.
Philo_T_Farnsworth t1_je6py0c wrote
It's interesting you use this example because I personally know someone who was convicted of a felony for assaulting a nursing home resident in their capacity as a caregiver. Evidently an old person got combative, things escalated, and it got physical. It was an open and shut case. That patient's senility cannot be seen as an excuse for what happened. A cop doing this should be subject to the very same justice.
SsurebreC t1_je6topo wrote
Exactly. I used my example because you can lose your cool trying to take care of someone. Caretaker fatigue is real and who suffers more than people whose entire jobs are doing that. But those people are still held to higher standards. Police officers should be held to even higher standards because they also have the power to end lives just because they lose their cool. So let's start with the same high standards to start and go from there.
DarthBluntSaber t1_je6l8fd wrote
Police forces seem to be trained more and more to view the communities they are supposed to PROTECT as if they the police are in some foreign land and they are their to keep the locals in line and like every citizen is a potential enemy.
_TheShapeOfColor_ t1_je6xm30 wrote
They're getting their training from lunatics like this.
They treat the general public as enemy combatants.
SsurebreC t1_je6m8nt wrote
That's why I wrote the last half because actual soldiers have better rules of engagements against even terrorists than police officers have against their own fellow Americans.
[deleted] t1_jebwz7a wrote
[removed]
Milfoy t1_je8qyx2 wrote
If you think police unions are dreadful, just wait until you try and get a payout from a police insurance company!
Insurance is such an American solution to this problem. How about
- better hiring and training.
- mandatory bodycams subject to random checks as well as use as evidence.
- National register of officers and their records
- No ability to duck investigations by resigning and moving elsewhere.
- Payouts come directly from the police budget.
SsurebreC t1_je9hq0j wrote
It's an American solution to the problem because it's pretty clear that America and Americans don't really give a damn about life or we'd have better laws and policies in place that actually protect it. We'd have a Federal law that requires paid paternity leave, we'd have better healthcare that takes care of mothers and children during birth in particular, we'd have tax incentives for child care, better and safer schools, plus we wouldn't be sending kids to wars. But we don't. Because we don't really care.
As a result, we turn to the only god we currently worship: money. It's a shitty solution but it's at least one that's plausible enough to work.
[deleted] t1_jea7nog wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je6b2at wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments