Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

CrankLeaf t1_iripv7y wrote

And the russians consider the bridge attack as an act of terrorism. They have to agree with Zelensky that Russia is a terrorist state then. Russian attacks on ukrainian infrastructure are in the 1000's, and counting.

117

agent42b t1_irirk6s wrote

It’s gonna be hit again.

118

ThePlanner t1_iriuap4 wrote

And let’s not forget Russia’s artillery strikes on operational Ukrainian nuclear power plants while also stationing Russian military equipment inside the structure of a nuclear power plant and going “whaaa? Not us” when IAEA inspectors discovered them.

40

N8CCRG t1_iriutqv wrote

I've given up believing that pointing out hypocrisy can move the needle at all on zealots (see the modern US Conservative movement). But it is good to point it out for third parties who perhaps are new to any issue or party or movement and hadn't yet seen enough information to know what's what.

7

Opaque_Cypher t1_iriv3b9 wrote

Open to “light traffic”… very very light, not-heavy, almost floaty traffic.

103

Igorius t1_iriv9zr wrote

These mfers live in an alternate reality. Russia as a nation and as a culture has failed. Throw it all in the trash and start over as a dozen separate countries.

29

SkunkMonkey t1_irixevq wrote

Seriously, the damage to the steel supporting that bridge suffered damage from the heat. You couldn't get me to walk across that bridge for all the money in the world. It's just begging to collapse.

37

Wanless29 t1_iriyiz0 wrote

Shit, here we go again

3

SewSewBlue t1_iriz9b1 wrote

Partly re-opened = open to engineers on foot doing inspections.

36

Tydogg123 t1_irj87tt wrote

Speed 3, Crimea bridge.

3

AVLThumper t1_irjct1f wrote

Ukraine,time for another visit.

9

nexusjuan t1_irjdfqi wrote

What about digging foxholes in the Red Forest inside the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Then catching the forest on fire with there on artillery. They said the soldiers started rioting when they started showing signs of radiation sickness.

28

MalcolmLinair t1_irjil6p wrote

It's just a little catastrophically structurally compromised, still a perfectly good bridge. /s

34

MrJenzie t1_irjnjfm wrote

good

HIT IT AGAIN

AND AGAIN

AND AGAIN

until there is no more scar

18

Wazula42 t1_irjua7x wrote

Under breath: to fish

4

VonRansak t1_irk78wi wrote

Appears to be empty load at testing crawl speed, with greatly reduced car count. Almost like they think it is possible it could break if they put too much weight or vibration in it.

22

MoreOfAnOvalJerk t1_irkxjnu wrote

It’s open, as in there’s a big open hole in it.

4

IDownvoteUrPet t1_irsb3g5 wrote

I would definitely walk across that bridge for all the money in the world. That’s a lot of money

Edit: on second thought, maybe like 1% of all the money in the world would be more than sufficient. Might be some unforeseen consequences in taking all the money in the world.

1

_senses_ t1_irt1yz6 wrote

I keep reading the "partly" in the title as "party" ... and in both states of mind I'm flipping between, your comment is perfectly reasonable .. cause partying on a damaged bridge is bad my friends

1