Submitted by darthatheos t3_y0fz8f in news
byebyecivilrights t1_irrv1n5 wrote
Reply to comment by Juggs_gotcha in CNN ‘deeply regrets’ distress caused by report on Thailand nursery killings by darthatheos
>Dude we've had daily reporting on horrors uncountable for my entire lifetime. Who, at this point, is left who has any soft skin to be uncomfortable
This is horrifying and a good question. I wonder I'd our brains are wired differently than those of our ancestors. The increasingly common response of "oh well" to things like the heat death of the universe or nuclear Armageddon probably wouldn't have existed 100 years ago. Or maybe it would have.
SpaceObama t1_irrwb8x wrote
Ancient peoples had their own apocalyptic predictions that they believed just as much as ad we do the heat death of the universe. They still said “oh well” and went on with their day.
byebyecivilrights t1_irrxf9f wrote
Yes, you're absolutely right, but I'm specifically thinking about my great grandmother who grew up in the great depression. Her response to negativity was always "oh well, let's keep moving forward anyway." But mine has always been "oh well, might as well give up -- if I die I die."
That's the specific difference I'm interested in. Although that might just be me.
Justicar-terrae t1_irsic5z wrote
You can find that same "Screw it. If I die, I die" attitude all throughout history.
Look at how people reacted to prevalent capital punishment back when it was widespread. There are accounts of child pickpockets in London plying their trade amongst audiences gathered to watch other child pickpockets being hanged. In Dan Carlin's Hardcore History podcast about capital punishment, he reads a letter written by a wealthy French woman describing how her friend did a decent job of not crying or screaming during her beheading for some trivial offense; the letter reads like the beheading was simply a casual affair. In various Roman and Greek historical accounts, people often treat their imminent executions as matter-of-fact chores. Cicero, Socrates, Regulus, and Agrippina come to mind; ditto early Christian martyrs (though they are least believed in an afterlife).
Look at how people treated warfare. For example, in the early gunpowder era there was a volunteer group in most armies called the forlorn hope whose job was to run straight at an entrenched enemy to make them fire their already loaded muskets and cannons. After the forlorn hope did their job as cannon fodder, the rest of the army would advance while the enemy reloaded and reorganized. What's surprising is that the forlorn hope, the name of which made clear how screwed its members were, was an all volunteer job yet frequently saw repeat members. There are letters from some of these repeat volunteers describing the absolute horrors of being in the forlorn hope and watching their friends in front and all around turn into red mist when hit with cannon fire or musket volleys. There were some soldiers who just didn't give a fuck whether they lived or died.
Look at the cold war nihilism, born from a common belief that the whole world was going up in mushroom clouds any day now. There are songs from the time poking fun at the inevitable doom. For examples: https://youtu.be/frAEmhqdLFs and https://youtu.be/KXSUEU7ISfQ and https://youtu.be/8XPzICHxXoQ
And those are just off the top of my head. People in the past were much like us. Any time things got really bad, bad to the point where hope seemed a distant memory, people have been able to put on a "eh, fuck it" face and keep on trudging on autopilot.
McWheelerson t1_irskwtz wrote
I appreciate your effort.
byebyecivilrights t1_irsr8hy wrote
True! I think we as human beings all have a tendency to think we're special lol
riptide81 t1_iruq2ke wrote
I honestly think part of it is living in relative luxury. For past generations the threats we’re much more immediate. If you didn’t keep moving forward during the Great Depression death was a very real possibly not just abstract melancholy. We can live in our heads and be complacent while still getting our basic needs met.
It’s gets harder the further back you go. Did you ever read a historical biography and note how many children they lost to illness yet somehow kept going?
It was basically only the second half of the 20th century on (depending on demographic) that a large number of regular people experienced fairly dependable comfort and security.
[deleted] t1_irs14pm wrote
[removed]
7718760119 t1_irs866r wrote
Wow I thought I was alone in my newfound nihilism. Glad I'm not!
SapientRaccoon t1_irumc4w wrote
They also had to endure more people around them dying if accidents and disease, and also a higher child mortality rate. They were closer to death, saw it more often.
myrddyna t1_irv4go4 wrote
> Ancient peoples had their own apocalyptic predictions
meh their predictions were that there would be a flood (which would contaminate water wells and if you couldn't find clean water in three days, your tribe died), or a drought (kills off food growing, so your tribe will starve, or die of dehydration moving to a new area), or just 'we'll be attacked by a rival tribe that will kill us!'
These are easy to predict, and foolishly attributed to the gods or prophecy. Today, we know a lot more, and the predictions are actually based in science, and are much much more accurate as to the greater future of mankind.
Us saying, "oh well" and going with our day is going to end with our extinction, as a species, rather than a tribe.
Two_Coast_Man t1_irry6ai wrote
The past was infinitely more violent than life in modern, developed countries. I've heard the theory floated that in medieval times, essentially everyone was dealing with some form of PTSD. Executions were a common public spectacle and the response to seeing them was a resounding "oh well".
byebyecivilrights t1_irsr4rc wrote
God how did I forget about that. Gladiators in the Roman empire, hangings in King Henry's time, lynchings during the Jim Crow era ... human beings really are violent, aren't we?
originalthoughts t1_iruhl3b wrote
Pretty much all animals are. Pigeons kill injured pigeons for example.
[deleted] t1_irtkp6z wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_irtw6bl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_irtabxf wrote
[removed]
CW1DR5H5I64A t1_irs4t7l wrote
The Hindenburg crash only killed 35 people. But we all still remember it almost a hundred years later like it was some kind of massive historical event.
I feel like if that happened today it might get one segment and then the next day/week everyone would forget about it.
theMTNdewd t1_irscb95 wrote
I think the video is 95% of the reason why it's so remembered. If there wasn't video, especially without that raw narration by the newscaster who's witnessing it ("oh the humanity") it wouldn't be as impactful and memorable as it was.
MississippiJoel t1_irsd9kq wrote
Minor historical nitpick here, but the audio you're referring to was a radio broadcast. Moving pictures didn't have sound in those days; someone else just paired the two together later.
MississippiJoel t1_irsdyle wrote
Historically, it's because it changed air travel. Airships were converted to using the non-combustible helium instead of hydrogen almost instantly.
But even that point aside, like the titanic, like the supposed war of the worlds riot, like the great fires of Chicago here and London over there, each great catastrophe gets one chance to completely knock us senseless. It's only by the subsequent ones that we start going "yeah, I knew that was possible. Wonder why they didn't prepare?"
CW1DR5H5I64A t1_irt6uky wrote
The vast majority of Airships already used helium. All of the US navy Air Ships stationed at Lakehurst Naval Air Station (where the crash happened) all used helium.
The Hindenburg (and other German airships) only used Hydrogen because of sanctions from WW1.
They knew it was dangerous, but they weren’t allowed access to the safer helium.
[deleted] t1_irtebz7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_irt2joq wrote
[removed]
nwash57 t1_irsaf4c wrote
A comment I saw that resonated with me the other day: "We are wired to handle the trauma of a village, not the trauma of the entire world"
ethnicbonsai t1_irsqyjg wrote
Our ancestors faced far more immediate and tangible examples of death and brutality than people typically do now, at least in the west. High infant mortality, war, famine, lack of sophisticated law and order……
We see stuff on TV. It wasn’t that long ago executions were a form of public entertainment.
WillDeletOneDay t1_irsvhx9 wrote
Don't forget the diseases and injuries as well as the extreme and inadequate treatments of them.
Almost no one living today will have to experience having their leg sawed off with no anesthesia. Or a slow painful death from tuberculosis.
[deleted] t1_irryvcs wrote
[removed]
AtticMuse t1_irtoxwn wrote
>The increasingly common response of "oh well" to things like the heat death of the universe
Why have any other reaction to the winding down of the universe trillions of trillions of years from now?
[deleted] t1_irtvvy6 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments