Submitted by BollocksAsBalls t3_ykv1ky in news
alien_from_Europa t1_iuw3rch wrote
Reply to comment by Imaginary_Medium in UN: Global warming to melt major glaciers by 2050, including Yosemite's by BollocksAsBalls
It can be sustainable, but costs are high and they need to be built on 25 acres of land near the shoreline to prevent the possibility of leaking into aquifers. You can make more of them if they're designed like ocean oil refineries that bring water to shore by pipeline, but that would cost even more. However, I can't imagine the costs being a problem by 2050 when facing no glaciers.
The main issue is the brine that is produced at the outflow. It's pretty bad for the environment. Solving that is essential before building thousands of them.
Amrokmfc t1_iuxaqrs wrote
The waste (brine) is a big problem.
kingofpotatopeople92 t1_iuzwmuy wrote
Dry it and refill the salt mines that have been already dug out.
Imaginary_Medium t1_iuywu6u wrote
It sounds very complicated. Thank you for explaining the process. I assume governments or the very rich are the only ones who could do that on a large scale.
I will of course be long dead by 2050, but I still fear for those who come after, having to cope with all that.
[deleted] t1_iuwy4ko wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iux7m65 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments