Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AudibleNod OP t1_ix8pgvj wrote

Like the Texas Woman who drove in the HOV lane while pregnant, twice.

40

TuesdayShuffle t1_ix8pls3 wrote

Hey! I actually liked that one, she was trying to prove a point. She actually got her first ticket thrown out.

142

AudibleNod OP t1_ix8ptsz wrote

They're gonna keep throwing that one out. Lest they be forced to defend their position of 'life begins at conception'. They're basically telling pregnant women to drive in the HOV lane for free.

68

strugglz t1_ix9hvv1 wrote

Well, not free. They still have to go through the hassle of getting the ticket dismissed.

13

muusandskwirrel t1_ixa7tn3 wrote

Only one seat in the car was in use.

−12

17times2 t1_ixdphjp wrote

Carpool lane signs and laws only specify multiple occupants, not multiple seats.

2

muusandskwirrel t1_ixdrc97 wrote

They could easily adjust the wording of the laws to get around the “when does life begin” argument, was my point

0

Rainbow-Death t1_ix96gmu wrote

Same, you can’t argue every pregnancy has human rights that supersede the mothers health or the right to choose where it’s viable or not and then pick and choose when it’s inconvenient for the law.

21

mces97 t1_ix8xwk0 wrote

I think Texas passed or is trying to pass a law saying pregnant women can use the hov lane.

6