Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_iwu4k92 wrote

[removed]

−69

daddynexxus OP t1_iwu4t1w wrote

Looked pretty compliant. Looks like some of the beeting took place after the cuffs were on. Video is here if you can see it : https://www.wlky.com/article/fbi-investigating-2021-dash-cam-hardin-county-deputies-punching-man-after-arrest/41996864

41

Sneaky_Bones t1_iwum181 wrote

Sounds like you're working backwards from conclusions you've already drawn without watching the video.

26

[deleted] t1_iwv8d2g wrote

[removed]

1

[deleted] t1_iwvaown wrote

[removed]

3

axonxorz t1_iwvivxu wrote

He read the statement saying there was a knife. He's questioning whether or not he actually had a knife, whether or not the police statement was factual. But get up his ass about it, that will help.

3

Sneaky_Bones t1_iwvt2tf wrote

Was you getting up in my ass suppose to help? I was "JuSt AsKiNg QuEsTiOnS" also.

1

axonxorz t1_iwvw4a6 wrote

> Was you getting up in my ass suppose to help?

Boo hoo, criticism of what you wrote.

The other poster appeared willing to accept that the "facts" presented by the police report may not have been factual. If someone can't even ask the question, I don't know what to tell you, they didn't appear to be JAQing off.

3

Sneaky_Bones t1_iww51su wrote

Did you actually take my comment as a complaint instead of just pointing out your hypocrisy? To be clear, I don't give af if you approve of me grilling an apologist or not. The video was widely available and the insinuating "questions" were more suggestive than they were necessary. Apologists are opportunistic, they test angles, gauge the room etc. until they have no recourse. So no, I don't feel the slightest bit bad shutting that shit down.

0

axonxorz t1_iwwb7p8 wrote

> Did you actually take my comment as a complaint instead of just pointing out your hypocrisy?

I don't believe there's hypocracy in my statement, you were being antagonistic, and I got up in your ass for it, they didn't seem to be.

I insinuated that the other person might have been on your side of this argument, and you're pushing them away by "getting up their ass".

Look, if they were indeed just JAQ'ing off, your response is what I would have done, but the top level comment they made seemed at least open to consideration of opposing viewpoints, and their post history was not that of a hardline cop-fellating chud.

2

Shazier_Beam t1_iwv06w6 wrote

What sort of dash cam footage would justify striking a suspect who is already cuffed and on the ground.

I'm not talking about holding or grappling which serves the purpose of controlling the suspect. I am talking about the repeated strikes.

>Tyler can be seen opening the driver’s side door of the vehicle with his hands in the air and kneeling on the road

Followed by

>Multiple officers then can be seen striking Tyler several times while he is on the ground.

Do I really feel that bad for Tyler? No, not really. he was a belligerent asshole.

But once he had given himself up that should have been the end of it. Unfortunately the cops still had their adrenaline/juice up so yeah they pounded him into the dirt. After cuffing him. After he gave up.

11

[deleted] t1_iwv8247 wrote

[removed]

1

Shazier_Beam t1_iwv8rpa wrote

You never addressed my question at the start of my comment.

What sort of video of the leadup would change the two facts below:

  1. The suspect gave himself up

  2. The police attacked the suspect after he was constrained

What sort of context are you looking for?

5

[deleted] t1_iwvcgvs wrote

[removed]

1

PunkySweet t1_iwvlbfw wrote

Bro you have so many comments in this thread you made your point but got lost in your own sauce get some fucking rest. Sometimes being technically correct isn't worth looking this craazy

2