Ignoring nuance to make a forced point is annoying af. Going to a 2,601 ft mountain with runs as long as 1.7 miles, maintained to insure high speeds for snow sports is not the same as your average mid western sledding hill. Yes, you CAN hurt yourself doing damned near anything but some contexts afford greater opportunities obviously.

I'd like to think if I were a cop, I'd pretend I didn't hear that and wish them a good evening and leave for fear of any consequences that kid might face for getting their family busted (unless the warrant was for something crazy like murder).

There are some dry counties but you can drink a beer in your own yard in most places in KY, even the dry counties.

Whatever cow told you that was lying.

Did you actually take my comment as a complaint instead of just pointing out your hypocrisy? To be clear, I don't give af if you approve of me grilling an apologist or not. The video was widely available and the insinuating "questions" were more suggestive than they were necessary. Apologists are opportunistic, they test angles, gauge the room etc. until they have no recourse. So no, I don't feel the slightest bit bad shutting that shit down.

Was you getting up in my ass suppose to help? I was "JuSt AsKiNg QuEsTiOnS" also.

"I'm allowed to say dumb things, deal with it" lol, okay, I think I can manage that.

Sounds like you're working backwards from conclusions you've already drawn without watching the video.

Will do.

Typical political violence is wrong, maybe most in history is wrong, but you can't be throwing out "universal truths" and not expect to be called out on how bullshit a statement it is. According to your statement the Warsaw Uprising was immoral, Turner's slave revolt was immoral, the American revolution was immoral...

If some of the larger UFO cases are believed, those would be soundless drones that travel 1000s of mph. Also, to play devil's advocate, what informs you that being unseen is a goal? I don't have an opinion on what these things are, have never seen one myself, but some events have hundreds of witnesses and I don't think drones or debris captures what they describe.

Journalism is reporting critical facts on important events, not turning important events into soap operas by exploiting the emotional impact. Do you really think it's okay how journalists will often hound grieving family mere moments after said family learns of their lost loved one. Would you want to wake up the next morning to see your child's blood splattered on the wall and being aired every hour followed by an ad for car insurance?